Revision as of 16:57, 16 August 2012 editAussieLegend (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers173,395 edits Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on Hotel Hell. (TW)← Previous edit |
Revision as of 17:11, 16 August 2012 edit undo76.189.121.5 (talk) AussieLegend edit-warred without following protocol and ignored clear, good faith edit commentsNext edit → |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
== Hotel Hell == |
|
|
Your edits to the article have been opposed by two editors. Please do not continue to force them into the article, which is ]. As per ] you discuss the edits on the article's talk page if you really think your edits should be included, and while the matter is under discussion, the ] reigns. --] (]) 16:56, 16 August 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== August 2012 == |
|
|
] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. |
|
|
|
|
|
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 16:57, 16 August 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
:''If this is a ], and you didn't make the edit, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> |
|