| Revision as of 17:21, 16 August 2012 editAussieLegend (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers173,395 edits →You have breached the three-revert rule: +← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:23, 16 August 2012 edit undo76.189.121.5 (talk) AussieLegend previously warned for edit-warring and failing to follow protocol. Collusion among editors to prevent good faith, quality edits.Next edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == You have breached the three-revert rule == | |||
| By making 4 reverts in less than 24 hours, you have breached the three-revert rule at ]. --] (]) 17:17, 16 August 2012 (UTC) | |||
| Despite the assertions in your edit summaries, the onus is upon ''you'' to initiate discussion on the article's talk page, as per ] and ]. This should have occurred after your edits were initially reverted. Simply reverting each time your edits were removed is edit-warring. The edits that you have made are inappropriate because they breach the manual of style, especially ] and removed cited, encyclopaedic content. --] (]) 17:21, 16 August 2012 (UTC) | |||