Revision as of 17:11, 16 August 2012 editMr. Stradivarius (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators59,191 edits →Muhammad Hussein Ali Hassan: Relisting comment← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:57, 16 August 2012 edit undoS Marshall (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers32,413 edits RemarkNext edit → | ||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
<hr style="width:55%;" /> | <hr style="width:55%;" /> | ||
*'''Relisting comment'''. I'd like to hear more about whether a merge would be warranted. — ''''']''''' <sup>(])</sup> 17:11, 16 August 2012 (UTC) | *'''Relisting comment'''. I'd like to hear more about whether a merge would be warranted. — ''''']''''' <sup>(])</sup> 17:11, 16 August 2012 (UTC) | ||
*Geo Swan's talk page is a remarkable sight. DBigXray, are you on some kind of one-editor cleanup crusade?—] <small>]/]</small> 18:57, 16 August 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:57, 16 August 2012
Muhammad Hussein Ali Hassan
- Muhammad Hussein Ali Hassan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
On a living (now released) prisoner from Guantanamo Fails WP:BLP1E, WP:NOTINHERITED, WP:BIO. There are no secondary sources or independent coverage to claim notability of the subject. The citation used are WP:PRIMARY sources (WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 84#Reliability of US military summary reports) DBigXray 14:14, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:25, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:25, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:25, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:26, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:26, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete, no significant coverage found to suggest subject passes WP:GNG, WP:BIO, or WP:SOLDIER.
- Comment concerning another editor not assuming good faith of my comments during the previous AfD: I have certain delete sort pages on my watch list, and thus why I have commented on previous AfDs. I am not a member of a cabal and did not enjoy the accusation made towards me and other editors during the previous AfD.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 06:12, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete - subject lacks "significant coverage" in reliable source therefore is unlikely to be notable under WP:GNG. Anotherclown (talk) 10:29, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Another Guantanamo article which fails the notability guidelines. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ 13:39, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
- I think smerger seems to be the best option, keeping some information and all the citations. Bearian (talk) 20:51, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- Merge and redirect to a section at Moroccan detainees at Guantanamo Bay, best solution to keep all available information when there isn't enough material for a standalone article. --Tachfin (talk) 04:04, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
- Redirect to Moroccan detainees at Guantanamo Bay, merging as necessary. - The Bushranger One ping only 06:18, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete - yet another non-notable article. Per nom, it clearly fails WP:BLP1E, WP:NOTINHERITED and WP:BIO. TheSpecialUser 14:40, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Mr. Stradivarius 17:06, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
- Relisting comment. I'd like to hear more about whether a merge would be warranted. — Mr. Stradivarius 17:11, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
- Geo Swan's talk page is a remarkable sight. DBigXray, are you on some kind of one-editor cleanup crusade?—S Marshall T/C 18:57, 16 August 2012 (UTC)