| Revision as of 20:42, 13 September 2012 editWaitingForConnection (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers15,212 edits I expect something which remotely justifies an article. Sending people to this appendix mention, instead of to the well balanced coverage at Hillsborough disaster, currently does the panel and report a disservice.← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:44, 13 September 2012 edit undoDePiep (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users294,285 edits Undid revision 512244678 by WaitingForConnection (talk) whatever YOU expect: the HIP report is quite heavy. Now start talking instead of deleting.Next edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{merge|Hillsborough disaster|date=September 2012}} | |||
| The '''Hillsborough Independent Panel''' is a panel installed by the British government to research the ] (1989). | |||
| On September 11, 2012, they publushed their report . | |||
| ==Resources== | |||
| <references> | |||
| {{stub}} | |||
| ] | |||
Revision as of 20:44, 13 September 2012
 | It has been suggested that this article be merged with Hillsborough disaster. (Discuss) Proposed since September 2012. |
The Hillsborough Independent Panel is a panel installed by the British government to research the Hillsborough disaster (1989).
On September 11, 2012, they publushed their report .
Resources
<references>
This article is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it. |