Misplaced Pages

Post-feminism: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 08:50, 19 April 2006 editMboverload (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers39,898 editsm Unicodifying article / #redirect fix using AWB← Previous edit Revision as of 17:49, 2 May 2006 edit undoClm17 (talk | contribs)36 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
The term '''Post-feminism''', or '''postfeminism''', first entered into American usage in the early 1980s, initially signifying backlash over ]. The term now denotes a wide range of theories, all of which argue that feminism is no longer relevant to today's society. (Tania Modleski, Feminism without Women: Culture and Criticism in a “Postfeminist” Age, (New York: Routledge, 1991), 3.)
{{Unreferenced}}
'''Post-feminism''', or '''postfeminism''', is an anti-] ] that opposes simplistic ] constructs of ] (i.e., ] and ]) in order to explore and identify conceptions of women outside of the ]. Post-feminist ] examines the gradual elimination of another form of binary opposition as well: "feminists" versus "non-feminists". The defactionalization of these once clearly-delineated groups is a result of the success of feminist ] and ] in making ] a concern of ] culture, in ] and in other sociocultural ]s.


One of the earliest uses of the tem was in ]'s 1982 1982 article "Voices of the Post-Feminist Generation," published in ]. This article was based on a number of interviews with women who largely agreed with the goals of feminism, but did not identify as feminists. (Rosen, Ruth. The World Split Open: How the Modern Women's Movement Changed America. New York: Viking, 2000, 275, 337.)
The term ''post-feminism'' does not imply that the era of ] and activism have concluded (victoriously or otherwise). Rather, ''post-feminism'' acknowledges that the fractured ] of the individual has changed in the ], informed by ] predicated in part by feminist influence; it is a tangential evolution of feminist thought.


The post-feminist texts which emerged in the 1980s and '90s portrayed feminism as a monolithic entity, thereby allowing the author to criticize the very generalizations he or she had created. (Amelia Jones, “Postfeminism, Feminist Pleasures, and Embodied Theories of Art,” New Feminist Criticism: Art, Identity, Action, Eds. Joana Frueh, Cassandra L. Langer and Arlene Raven, (New York: HarperCollins, 1994), 16-41, 20.) Some claimed that feminism forced women to view themselves as victims, while others posited that women had grown dienchanted with feminism and now wished to return to domesticity.
The work of ] (especially her ] book '']'') and various "gender-bending" authors—such as ], ], and ]—exhibit nuances of post-feminist thought.


==Post-Feminist Texts==
] is often cited as the first post-feminist ], since it breaks the mother/whore ], and ] gender and ]. Since many people decry pornography as inherently ], some may confuse post-feminist politics with ].
* Rene Denfeld, The New Victorians: A Young Woman’s Challenge to the Old Feminist Order, (New York: Warner Books, 1995)

* Katie Roiphe’s The Morning After: Fear, Sex and Feminism on Campus (1993)


==See also== ==See also==
* ] * ]
* ]
{{fem-stub}} {{fem-stub}}
] ]

Revision as of 17:49, 2 May 2006

The term Post-feminism, or postfeminism, first entered into American usage in the early 1980s, initially signifying backlash over second-wave feminism. The term now denotes a wide range of theories, all of which argue that feminism is no longer relevant to today's society. (Tania Modleski, Feminism without Women: Culture and Criticism in a “Postfeminist” Age, (New York: Routledge, 1991), 3.)

One of the earliest uses of the tem was in Susan Bolotin's 1982 1982 article "Voices of the Post-Feminist Generation," published in ''New York Times Magazine''. This article was based on a number of interviews with women who largely agreed with the goals of feminism, but did not identify as feminists. (Rosen, Ruth. The World Split Open: How the Modern Women's Movement Changed America. New York: Viking, 2000, 275, 337.)

The post-feminist texts which emerged in the 1980s and '90s portrayed feminism as a monolithic entity, thereby allowing the author to criticize the very generalizations he or she had created. (Amelia Jones, “Postfeminism, Feminist Pleasures, and Embodied Theories of Art,” New Feminist Criticism: Art, Identity, Action, Eds. Joana Frueh, Cassandra L. Langer and Arlene Raven, (New York: HarperCollins, 1994), 16-41, 20.) Some claimed that feminism forced women to view themselves as victims, while others posited that women had grown dienchanted with feminism and now wished to return to domesticity.

Post-Feminist Texts

  • Rene Denfeld, The New Victorians: A Young Woman’s Challenge to the Old Feminist Order, (New York: Warner Books, 1995)
  • Katie Roiphe’s The Morning After: Fear, Sex and Feminism on Campus (1993)

See also

Stub icon

This feminism-related article is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Categories: