Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
:This appears to be contradicted by the two studies, now mentioned in background. --] 09:28, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
:This appears to be contradicted by the two studies, now mentioned in background. --] 09:28, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
*"Current observations and models of ] trace ] ] and ] that cause most galaxies in a rough statistical sense to have correlated positions, but such groupings do not have the characteristics suggested by Tifft and his enthusiasts." {{fact}}
:Absence of evidence, is not evidence of absence. Again, we need a verifiable statement that directly addresses Tifft's observations.
Revision as of 09:33, 3 May 2006
Citations required
"In particular, many opponents of the Big Bang from Halton Arp to creationists to geocentrists have referred to such observations as reason to reject the standard account of the origin and evolution of the universe."
This requires three citations, one each referring to (a) Halton Arp (b) Creationists (c) Geocentrists, each specifying that redshift quantization is their reason to reject the standard account, etc.
"Tifft's proposals are relatively unknown even among professionals."
"Of the small number of instances known where independent corroboration of the phenomenon has been attempted, there has been no evidence for quantization of redshifts."
"Current observations and models of large-scale structure models trace filamentarysuperclusters and voids that cause most galaxies in a rough statistical sense to have correlated positions, but such groupings do not have the characteristics suggested by Tifft and his enthusiasts."
Absence of evidence, is not evidence of absence. Again, we need a verifiable statement that directly addresses Tifft's observations.