| Revision as of 05:57, 27 September 2012 editErpert (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers48,272 editsm comment← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:00, 27 September 2012 edit undoErpert (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers48,272 edits This sounds better, imoNext edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| ***Two entirely different things? Really? You say that after and ? And to anyone else monitoring this, proof of forum shopping began and , and then spilled into , and . This is thus a ] nomination. '''<span style="color:orange;">Erpert</span>''' <small><sup><span style="color:green;">]</span> | <span style="color:yellow;">]</span></sup></small> 18:23, 26 September 2012 (UTC) | ***Two entirely different things? Really? You say that after and ? And to anyone else monitoring this, proof of forum shopping began and , and then spilled into , and . This is thus a ] nomination. '''<span style="color:orange;">Erpert</span>''' <small><sup><span style="color:green;">]</span> | <span style="color:yellow;">]</span></sup></small> 18:23, 26 September 2012 (UTC) | ||
| ****Yes, two entirely different things. What you have linked shows evidence that I have doubts about this song being released as a single. If you'll notice, my nomination doesn't mention that argument what-so-ever. Whether or not a song is strictly defined as single is a separate argument from suggesting a topic doesn't have enough independent coverage to warrant a separate article. The outcome of this AFD and the outcome of the DRN will result in two completely different things. It's highly disruptive to bring an outside argument into this AFD. If you'd like to discuss this with me further, do so on my talk page as it's completely irrelevant here. Please comment on whether or not this article meets ] criteria or not. Thanks. ] (]) 19:30, 26 September 2012 (UTC) | ****Yes, two entirely different things. What you have linked shows evidence that I have doubts about this song being released as a single. If you'll notice, my nomination doesn't mention that argument what-so-ever. Whether or not a song is strictly defined as single is a separate argument from suggesting a topic doesn't have enough independent coverage to warrant a separate article. The outcome of this AFD and the outcome of the DRN will result in two completely different things. It's highly disruptive to bring an outside argument into this AFD. If you'd like to discuss this with me further, do so on my talk page as it's completely irrelevant here. Please comment on whether or not this article meets ] criteria or not. Thanks. ] (]) 19:30, 26 September 2012 (UTC) | ||
| *****''I'm'' disruptive? ]? |
*****''I'm'' disruptive? ]? Anyway, I would be happy to just ], but I can't help but wonder which noticeboard you're going to use next. '''<span style="color:orange;">Erpert</span>''' <small><sup><span style="color:green;">]</span> | <span style="color:yellow;">]</span></sup></small> 05:57, 27 September 2012 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Merge''' to ]. There's fairly wide coverage of this single (, , , , , , , , ) but nothing that has enough to really justify a standalone article. --] (]) 06:22, 26 September 2012 (UTC) | *'''Merge''' to ]. There's fairly wide coverage of this single (, , , , , , , , ) but nothing that has enough to really justify a standalone article. --] (]) 06:22, 26 September 2012 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 06:00, 27 September 2012
Demons (Sleigh Bells song)
- Demons (Sleigh Bells song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NSONG criteria, specifically: "a separate article on a song is only appropriate when there is enough verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged to articles about an artist or album." After conducting my own research, the majority of the articles out there merely mention a music video exists, or the song gets mentioned in a review. There's not much information specifically pertaining to this song that one could plausibly expand the article very much beyond what it is now. Fezmar9 (talk) 03:12, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
- Seriously, what is your problem? Are you still forum shopping? Third opinion didn't work, the Discographies WikiProject didn't work, DRN didn't work, so now you're coming to AfD? All this is making yourself look bad, you know. (And at the very least, the article could be merged to Reign of Terror (album).) Erpert 06:14, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
- Our other dispute is regarding the definition of a single. This AFD is based purely on notability and warranting an independent article. These are two entirely different things. Please either contribute constructive, relevent comments to this discussion, or don't comment at all. Fezmar9 (talk) 06:31, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
- Two entirely different things? Really? You say that after this and this? And to anyone else monitoring this, proof of forum shopping began here and here, and then spilled into here, here and here. This is thus a bad-faith nomination. Erpert 18:23, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, two entirely different things. What you have linked shows evidence that I have doubts about this song being released as a single. If you'll notice, my nomination doesn't mention that argument what-so-ever. Whether or not a song is strictly defined as single is a separate argument from suggesting a topic doesn't have enough independent coverage to warrant a separate article. The outcome of this AFD and the outcome of the DRN will result in two completely different things. It's highly disruptive to bring an outside argument into this AFD. If you'd like to discuss this with me further, do so on my talk page as it's completely irrelevant here. Please comment on whether or not this article meets WP:NSONG criteria or not. Thanks. Fezmar9 (talk) 19:30, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
- I'm disruptive? How can you say that with a straight face? Anyway, I would be happy to just leave this alone, but I can't help but wonder which noticeboard you're going to use next. Erpert 05:57, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, two entirely different things. What you have linked shows evidence that I have doubts about this song being released as a single. If you'll notice, my nomination doesn't mention that argument what-so-ever. Whether or not a song is strictly defined as single is a separate argument from suggesting a topic doesn't have enough independent coverage to warrant a separate article. The outcome of this AFD and the outcome of the DRN will result in two completely different things. It's highly disruptive to bring an outside argument into this AFD. If you'd like to discuss this with me further, do so on my talk page as it's completely irrelevant here. Please comment on whether or not this article meets WP:NSONG criteria or not. Thanks. Fezmar9 (talk) 19:30, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
- Two entirely different things? Really? You say that after this and this? And to anyone else monitoring this, proof of forum shopping began here and here, and then spilled into here, here and here. This is thus a bad-faith nomination. Erpert 18:23, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
- Our other dispute is regarding the definition of a single. This AFD is based purely on notability and warranting an independent article. These are two entirely different things. Please either contribute constructive, relevent comments to this discussion, or don't comment at all. Fezmar9 (talk) 06:31, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
- Merge to Reign of Terror (album). There's fairly wide coverage of this single (, , , , , , , , ) but nothing that has enough to really justify a standalone article. --Michig (talk) 06:22, 26 September 2012 (UTC)