Revision as of 06:19, 5 October 2012 editNorthamerica1000 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators708,032 edits tag layout← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:20, 5 October 2012 edit undoNorthamerica1000 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators708,032 edits →Indian Century: changed to header2. no other changesNext edit → | ||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
==Indian Century== | |||
Indian century is as common a term as Chinese century is so why some users r objecting against making this pageLAKSJD1 21:29, 10 September 2009 (UTC) | Indian century is as common a term as Chinese century is so why some users r objecting against making this pageLAKSJD1 21:29, 10 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 06:20, 5 October 2012
India Stub‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||
|
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Indian Century article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
This article was nominated for deletion on 28 August 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
Indian Century
Indian century is as common a term as Chinese century is so why some users r objecting against making this pageLAKSJD1 21:29, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
India is often called the next big superpower it has a thriving economy, third largest military, large land area, large population, nukes, stable and democratic government etc. LAKSJD1 21:33, 10 September 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by LAKSJD1 (talk • contribs)
Do we really need a neologism for a possibility? In fact, does it make sense to create an encyclopedia article on a personal/non-scientific hypothesis? If it was a movement, or an ideology, it might have made sense to document it, but this is not that either. I'm pretty sure the British and American centuries were named in hindsight, not as a prophecies. Y not math (talk) 20:22, 26 July 2012 (UTC) Y not math (talk) 01:51, 27 July 2012 (IST)
Notable?
Well, actually to discuss whether or not this article is remarkable. One should not pursue this edit war. Those who are opposed to present their arguments.
Start the discussion, but do not know if I will continue with it ... My available time is limited. Hallel (talk) 19:22, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
- The concept appears at first glance to be quite notable Three academic books just on a cursory search. Facts, not fiction (talk) 20:00, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
AfD
The article has been nominated for deletion as it fails WP:GNG and has several issues. Mar4d (talk) 07:02, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
- Complicado editar com quem força WP:POINT. Desisto do artigo! Hallel (talk) 13:57, 1 October 2012 (UTC)