| Revision as of 11:04, 6 October 2012 editParrot of Doom (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers42,489 edits →The Guardian: because← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:22, 7 October 2012 edit undoMiszaBot III (talk | contribs)597,462 editsm Robot: Archiving 1 thread (older than 5d) to User talk:Parrot of Doom/Archives/2012/October.Next edit → | ||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
| |archive = User talk:Parrot of Doom/Archives/%(year)d/%(monthname)s | |archive = User talk:Parrot of Doom/Archives/%(year)d/%(monthname)s | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| == ] == | |||
| I have nom'd this at ] ] ] 01:22, 2 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == A barnstar for you! == | == A barnstar for you! == | ||
Revision as of 13:22, 7 October 2012
 Some basic rules. One, anyone coming here accusing me of WP:OWN will be told in no uncertain terms where to shove it. Two, anyone whinging about WP:CIVIL will be referred to the previous answer. Three, anyone coming here with a genuine request for help will of course be afforded all the help I can give. Four, never again will I venture onto ANI or any similar admin-related pages, either to resolve an issue, or to respond to somebody else's issue; I'm here to write articles, nothing else. Five, I apologise to those who've supported me in the past, but good-faith content editors can only put up with so much nonsense before they begin to question what good, if any, they're doing here. One day, I'm sure, all that's left here will be a clique of admins and a claque of their sycophants; the rest of the world will have moved on, hopefully to projects where people's contributions are valued, and not decried. |
 Archives |
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
A barnstar for you!
|
the Original Barnstar |
| Thanks for all the hard work you did at Pink Floyd. Without your excellent GA as a foundation, the article would not be a FA today. Cheers! ~ GabeMc 00:09, 3 October 2012 (UTC) |
- Well done, I haven't had the article on my watchlist for some time though. Parrot of Doom 08:22, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
- Nonetheless, without your fine GA article to work from, the FA promotion would not have been possible. Thanks and cheers! ~ GabeMc 20:44, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
The Guardian
How is The Guardian a dubious reference??--A pinhead (talk) 10:44, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
- Because it almost certainly takes its information from the Daily Mail. Parrot of Doom 11:04, 6 October 2012 (UTC)