User talk:The Bushranger: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 23:24, 12 October 2012 editThe Bushranger (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators157,919 edits →A cheeseburger for you!: :-)← Previous edit		Revision as of 23:25, 12 October 2012 edit undoDrmargi (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers43,766 edits →A beer for you!: new WikiLove messageNext edit →
Line 70:		Line 70:
	\|}		\|}
	:]. Thanks! {{P}} - ] <sub><font color="maroon">]</font></sub> 23:24, 12 October 2012 (UTC)		:]. Thanks! {{P}} - ] <sub><font color="maroon">]</font></sub> 23:24, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

			== A beer for you! ==

			{\| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
			\|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" \| ]
			\|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" \| A good burger needs a tall, cold one to wash it down! ] (]) 23:25, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
			\|}

Revision as of 23:25, 12 October 2012

If I leave a message for you: Please respond on your talk page. I'll probably add it to my watchlist, but if I miss something, feel free to leave a talkback.

If you leave a message for me: I will most likely respond here. Either add this page to your watchlist or ask me to notify you of a response on your talk page.

Note: I reserve the right to decline or withdraw from a situation that is escalating or uncomfortable, without giving a reason, or to take further action through permissable means. (See this policy.)

If I mistakenly called your edits as vandalism when I reverted them, it was probably because you did not leave an edit summary. Please realize that, in many cases, unexplained edits are indistinguishable from vandalism! This also applies to Rollbacks.

If you're here to troll, harass, or vandalise, I might not be able to stop you, but you will be reverted...and beware the giant dice.

This editor is an Illustrious Looshpah and is entitled to display this Book of All Knowledge.

Archives

as Aerobird - Jul 2008-Apr 2010 - May 2010 - Jun 2010-Oct 2010 - Nov 2010-Dec 2010 - Jan 2011-Mar 2011 - Apr 2011-Sep 2011 - Oct 2011 - Nov 2011-Dec 2011 - Jan 2012-Feb 2012 - Mar 2012-Apr 2012 - Apr 2012-May 2012 - Jun 2012 - Jul 2012

This page has archives. Sections older than 1.5 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 2 sections are present.

Userfy Cisco ASA

Can you drop a copy in my userspace? I'm not sure if you realized it, but I think the original nominator probably voted again later at least once. Anyway I can probably make it into a better article that clearly meets notability. Gigs (talk) 20:18, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Heh I also just noted that User:SpudMcCoy, one of the other delete vote accounts, seems to be almost an SPA promoting Nortel and Avaya security appliances. Gigs (talk) 20:21, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

It seems that this rabbit hole goes deep. There's a concerted and ongoing effort to delete Avaya competitors and increase Avaya coverage. Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet_investigations/LES_953. Hundreds of Cisco and other articles have been deleted, as this group piles on Keep votes to Avaya AfDs. Gigs (talk) 21:37, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Here you go.

- The Bushranger _{One ping only} 19:05, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

Masanori Asami

Why can't we be rid of him yet?—Ryulong (琉竜) 07:47, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

He's revealed his agenda to change what the English and Chinese consider to be part of the "Ryukyu Islands".—Ryulong (琉竜) 13:23, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

I sense a block coming in a hurry for him. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 21:52, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Cardinalsmyles

Speaking of blocks, just a heads up, but I'm not sure the block did much good. The nonsensical/disruptive editing, albeit now copyvios, has resumed on Hawaii Five-0 and its episode page. Cluelessness continues, no response to warnings and no edit summaries or action on talk pages. --Drmargi (talk) 22:46, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Trying one final whack with the cluehammer... - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 06:58, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

I was teaching tonight, and used a variant on the cluehammer. Clever! --Drmargi (talk) 02:35, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

I was so hoping this could be avoided, but I fear it's time to lower the cluehammer. We've had two more incidents, one copyvio, and one disruptive. Warning go unheeded (see talk page; I warned for both) and no change of behavior. It's almost like he/she is showing someone how to move a list table to a new article; he/she puts it in, then takes it back. More likely, they don't know how to work around the redirect I put in. Either way, I see no productive editing to speak of aside from very small stuff. --Drmargi (talk) 15:52, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Alas, seems so. I'll take a further look when I'm more awake... - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 10:49, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

In your own time. Sorry to keep bothering you about this, but what a nuisance this editor is! --Drmargi (talk) 13:16, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

He/she did it again --- copyvio and the attempt at moving. It's so weird! --Drmargi (talk) 00:23, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Indeed; and they still refuse to discuss, at all, ever; I don't think any more WP:ROPE can be reasonably given. Accordingly, I've indef'd them; maybe if they finally start discussing now progress can be made. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 22:24, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

One can but hope. I do think a sockpuppet alert is in order as well, just in case. Thank you! --Drmargi (talk) 22:37, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

CfD for Category:University of Great Falls

See my comment at Misplaced Pages:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2012_October_3#Category:University_of_Great_Falls.

Does that change your mind on the proposed merger? --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 10:52, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Ehhhh, I'm kinda 50-50 on it. Having the university category as the parent does sorta make sense, but at the same time it's still a one-article category aside from its subcats. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 10:49, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Darn that TCM!

I found another "lost"gem, The Man Who Found Himself on tv today. It turns out to be screen legend Joan Fontaine's first starring role, and she literally chews up the screen. FWiW, it's also an aviation flic. Bzuk (talk) 18:00, 11 October 2012 (UTC).

Another one?

G'day from Oz; I came across this new User. His/her edit history started just before the last SPI, so I'm not sure of this one being an Rk sock, but there is a very familiar pattern to the edits. I guess if there can be a "false positive" in an SPI such as we saw a couple of months back, there can also be a false negative. D'you reckon it's worth another SPI at this stage? YSSYguy (talk) 01:59, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

If that's a false positive, I'll eat my hat. (And it's a very Nize Hat.) I'd certainly say it's time to send that one to SPI. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 22:27, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

A cheeseburger for you!

I like your style, IRWolfie- (talk) 23:23, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Om nom nom nom nom. Thanks!

- The Bushranger _{One ping only} 23:24, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

A beer for you!

A good burger needs a tall, cold one to wash it down! Drmargi (talk) 23:25, 12 October 2012 (UTC)