Misplaced Pages

Nymphaeales: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:48, 30 April 2006 editCrux (talk | contribs)160 edits image removed, is gonna be deleted on Commons← Previous edit Revision as of 22:55, 6 May 2006 edit undoBrya (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,919 edits updateNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
'''''Nymphaeales''''' is a ] at the rank of ]. Such an order has been recognised by some ], but it is not accepted by the ], of 2003 (unchanged from the ] of 1998).
{{Taxobox
| color = lightgreen
⚫ | name = Nymphaeales
| image = NympheaColorataPeterAfrica.JPG
| image_width = 240px
| image_caption = ''Nymphea colorata''
| regnum = ]ae
| divisio = ]
| classis = ]
⚫ | ordo = '''Nymphaeales'''
| ordo_authority = ]
| subdivision_ranks = Families
| subdivision =
] - fanworts<br/>
] - water lilies
}}


The suggests that the order could be resurrected, for one or two families '']'' and '']''. This suggestion may be taken up in APG III.
The '''Nymphaeales''' are an order of ]s, including two families of aquatic ]s:
*Family ] (water lily family; including Barclayaceae)
*Family ] (fanwort family)


====Cronquist====
Sometimes the Cabombaceae are included within the Nymphaeaceae, though they are very distinct in appearance, with finely divided, entirely submerged ], unlike the broadly circular floating leaves of Nymphaeaceae.
The ], of 1981, placed it in subclass '']'', in class '']'' ]]
of division '']'' . It used this circumscription:
⚫ * order ''Nymphaeales''
:* family '']''
:* family '']''
:* family '']''
:* family '']''
:* family '']''


====Thorne (1992)====
The Nymphaeales, taken in the modern sense from the ] studies of the ], appear to have diverged from the other flowers very early on, representing a basal clade offshoot of the flowering plants.
The ] placed it in superorder '']'' in subclass ''Magnoliideae'' in class ''Magnoliopsida'' . It used this circumscription:
⚫ * order ''Nymphaeales''
:* family ''Cabombaceae''
:* family ''Nymphaeaceae''


====Dahlgren====
The older ] also included two other families; the ], now treated in the order ], and the ], now treated in the order ].
The ] placed it in superorder ''Nymphaeanae'',
in subclass ''Magnoliideae'' , in class ''Magnoliopsida'' . It used this circumscription:
⚫ * order ''Nymphaeales''
:* family ''Cabombaceae''
:* family ''Nymphaeaceae''
:* family ''Ceratophyllaceae''


] ]
⚫ ]


] ]

Revision as of 22:55, 6 May 2006

Nymphaeales is a botanical name at the rank of order. Such an order has been recognised by some systems of plant taxonomy, but it is not accepted by the APG II system, of 2003 (unchanged from the APG system of 1998).

The AP-website suggests that the order could be resurrected, for one or two families Nymphaeaceae and Cabombaceae. This suggestion may be taken up in APG III.

Cronquist

The Cronquist system, of 1981, placed it in subclass Magnoliidae, in class Magnoliopsida of division Magnoliophyta . It used this circumscription:

  • order Nymphaeales

Thorne (1992)

The Thorne system (1992) placed it in superorder Nymphaeanae in subclass Magnoliideae in class Magnoliopsida . It used this circumscription:

  • order Nymphaeales
  • family Cabombaceae
  • family Nymphaeaceae

Dahlgren

The Dahlgren system placed it in superorder Nymphaeanae, in subclass Magnoliideae , in class Magnoliopsida . It used this circumscription:

  • order Nymphaeales
  • family Cabombaceae
  • family Nymphaeaceae
  • family Ceratophyllaceae
Category: