| Revision as of 03:41, 29 October 2012 editTristan noir (talk | contribs)973 edits (Reverting ridiculous accusation/projection.)← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:20, 30 October 2012 edit undoHijiri88 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users37,390 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| :::Thanks for the heads-up. I've placed my comments at dispute resolution already and will wait for further discussion or queries from the volunteer referee or moderator before determining if it is useful to contribute more.] (]) 17:29, 17 October 2012 (UTC) | :::Thanks for the heads-up. I've placed my comments at dispute resolution already and will wait for further discussion or queries from the volunteer referee or moderator before determining if it is useful to contribute more.] (]) 17:29, 17 October 2012 (UTC) | ||
| == Re: Your comments at '']'' == | |||
| ] Please do not ] other editors. Comment on ''content'', not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please ] and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-npa2 --> | |||
| :I have reverted your blanking my above comment. There's no need to be childish, TN. If you want to blank my comment, you're free to do so, but please do not engage in childish mimicry in your edit summary. Your posting this same notice on my talk page without any justification (I have not engaged in personal attacks '''once''' in my disputes with you) was childish and petty, so I reverted it. You then abused the edit summary by mimicking me -- I have not engaged in ridiculous accusations or projection in this dispute either. The fact is that, once again, the majority of your comments have consisted of nothing but ridiculous personal attacks against me, so I was justified in posting the above template. You were not. ] (]) 06:20, 30 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 06:20, 30 October 2012
Notice of Dispute resolution discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we request your participation in the discussion to help find a resolution. The thread is "Prosimetrum". Thank you! EarwigBot 12:01, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
- Hi Tristan! Not meaning to be confrontational, but I'm concerned that our little dispute at Prosimetrum won't get anywhere until a volunteer assesses the Dispute Resolution request. I am given the impression that it takes longer (or may not even happen) if one of the opening comments is more than the requested 2,000 characters in length. Under these circumstances, your comment here is a bit long. You began by saying you would keep your comments to a minimum, but you are actually the only one of the four of us who exceeded the 2,000 characters. For future reference, it is the un-wikied text one types in, not the text that appears on the actual page, that is counted. elvenscout742 (talk) 01:26, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
- Just a note to alert you to the fact that discussion has now been opened at Misplaced Pages:Dispute resolution noticeboard#Prosimetrum. --gråb whåt you cån (talk) 19:30, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for the heads-up. I've placed my comments at dispute resolution already and will wait for further discussion or queries from the volunteer referee or moderator before determining if it is useful to contribute more.Tristan noir (talk) 17:29, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
Re: Your comments at Talk:Haibun
Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.
- I have reverted your blanking my above comment. There's no need to be childish, TN. If you want to blank my comment, you're free to do so, but please do not engage in childish mimicry in your edit summary. Your posting this same notice on my talk page without any justification (I have not engaged in personal attacks once in my disputes with you) was childish and petty, so I reverted it. You then abused the edit summary by mimicking me -- I have not engaged in ridiculous accusations or projection in this dispute either. The fact is that, once again, the majority of your comments have consisted of nothing but ridiculous personal attacks against me, so I was justified in posting the above template. You were not. elvenscout742 (talk) 06:20, 30 October 2012 (UTC)