Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 15:38, 30 October 2012

Archives

2007 May | Jun | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec 2008 Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Nov 2009 Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun  Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec 2010 Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun  Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec 2011 Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun  Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec 2012 Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun  Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec

This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Removal of erroneous information.

I left a blank space here http://en.wikipedia.org/Gospel_of_Judas#Scholarly_debates because there is no reason for April's information to be there. The New York Times "Article" is merely an online opinion post. http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/01/opinion/01deconink.html?_r=2&oref=slogin

Daimon is very clearly used to be NOT a demon in gnostic texts. Her lack of supportive references outside of her personal opinion blog deem it necessary to remove.

Hans Dieter Betz, Professor of New Testement, Divinity School, University of Chicago.

Burnley F.C. Season 09-10

You know nothing about this football club, please do not revert my edits again.

Thanks...

...for the barnstar! It was completely unexpected and highly appreciated. Enjoy this cookie :-)

SBC-YPR has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Smile

WikiProject:Articles for Creation October - November 2012 Backlog Elimination Drive

WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from October 22, 2012 – November 21, 2012.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 1000 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

EdwardsBot (talk) 00:14, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Will try. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 03:57, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 October 2012

• Special report: Examining adminship from the German perspective

• Arbitration report: Malleus Fatuorum accused of circumventing topic ban; motion to change "net four votes" rule

• Technology report: Wikivoyage migration: technical strategy announced

• Discussion report: Good articles on the main page?; reforming dispute resolution

• News and notes: Wikimedians get serious about women in science

• WikiProject report: Where in the world is Misplaced Pages?

• Featured content: Is RfA Kafkaesque?

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 12:11, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

"Advertisment" tag

You appear to have edited the page Ottawa Paramedic Service and added a tag suggesting that the article isn't written from a neutral point of view. I would like to know what leads you to believe this? I have spent some time recently working on Wikifying the page and adding internal and external links to supporting or defining pages to assist the reader, I do not believe that this in any way compromises the neutrality of the article. Please explain what specifically you take issue with.--Gillian.cross (talk) 17:11, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Yes, I did edit the article. I put back the advert tag because the article still promotes the subject heavily. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 18:02, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Clearly we are not on the same page here. I understand that you are saying that the article promotes the subject matter, but I do not understand how I can describe the Ottawa Paramedic Service without talking about the subject matter. Your vague replies are not helpful, please direct me to what you find specifically offensive.--Gillian.cross (talk) 18:32, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

I didn't find anything offensive. You have misinterpreted what I said. I said that it promotes the subject. Yes to describe the subject you will have to talk about it. Eg: During the 1960s the city, once again, took a leadership role and mandated stringent training requirements for personnel and standards for equipment and cleaning which at that time was well beyond most jurisdictions. The phrases leadership role, well beyond most jurisdictions is not from a neutral point of view. I hope you get my point. Cheers, --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 18:39, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Greetings!

Hello, I've added the template of Georgian ethnicity. I wanted to say that no vandalism took place from our side. Thank you for understanding. Regards. Mitantiongrey (talk) 06:40, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

My mistake. When I saw it on Stiki, I thought you were removing date. Once again, apologies. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 06:47, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

Thanks!

sorry for the late response. I am very pleased that you found the article useful and thanks for taking the time to appreciate. --CarTick (talk) 01:13, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

You're most welcome. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 09:01, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Rajdhani, Shatabdi & Janshatabdi Edits

Rsrikanth05, may i enquire as to why you have removed the images i had put up on the various articles without so much so as a comment on the respective talk page? Superfast1111 (talk) 04:57, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Hi, I undid your edits because there were too many images on the same page which is not recommended as per the WP:MOS and WP:IUP. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 09:41, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

I doubt 3 images on Janshatabdi classify as too many, as for Rajdhani & Shatabdi well i would say the more the merrier. There are other articles which have a good number of images but i have always appreciated the efforts of the individuals who put them there & contrary to what a certain somebody may believe i doubt those who who uploaded the images did it for self gratification. I have myself downloaded quite a few images from wikipedia & hence i would request you to let the images be & undo your edit. Superfast1111 (talk) 17:13, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

I myself am an uploader to the Commons. But sorry, More the Merrier isn't really always good. If it's going to clutter the page then it is definitely not a good thing. I will have a word with someone who understands the image placement policy better than me first and then get back to you. Thank you. Happy editing. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 12:22, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

I agree with user:Rsrikanth. I have reverted unrelated pics added to Chennai article. Superfast, Why can't you start an article, say, list of railway stations, or trains, in India, Chennai etc.? You can add your pics there?Challengethelimits (talk) 15:37, 30 October 2012 (UTC)