| Revision as of 19:08, 8 November 2012 editBigDom (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators23,736 edits →Thanks: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:34, 8 November 2012 edit undoDUCKISJAMMMY (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers19,231 edits →Zen-like: new WikiLove messageNext edit → | ||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
| Cheers for sorting that out, God knows what happened there. I think that might have put paid to me ever getting the bit back if I wanted it haha. Thanks again, ] (]) 19:08, 8 November 2012 (UTC) | Cheers for sorting that out, God knows what happened there. I think that might have put paid to me ever getting the bit back if I wanted it haha. Thanks again, ] (]) 19:08, 8 November 2012 (UTC) | ||
| == Zen-like == | |||
| {| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
| |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''Zen-like''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | For keeping calm in face of constant antagonism from a user who fails to understand or chooses not to understand policies. ★☆ ]☆★ 19:34, 8 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
Revision as of 19:34, 8 November 2012
 Archives |
Guidelines & Criteria
GiantSnowman appears to delete articles before actually looking at the criteria. Gregoryat (talk) 20:36, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
You can start by re-reading this, WP:GNP and WP:Football. Gregoryat (talk) 21:00, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
Please look at the policies again. WP:GNG, I don't think you are grasping the subject matter. Gregoryat (talk) 20:12, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
I will go over the policies line by line to help the "blind" editors understand the policies. Gregoryat (talk) 20:18, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Juventus players
Your nomination said "this is a category for youth players for a football club, but consensus at WT:FOOTY holds that such categories are obsolete as all eligible players should be included in the more general Category:Juventus F.C. players instead" - which I took to mean that youth players should be included in the parent category, which is a merger request not a delete request. If, as you later said in reply to BHG, they are already in the parent category, then merger and deletion will have the same effect, but a merger has the benefit of ensuring that none of the youth players presently in the category are left without a Juventus player category. If there had been just a couple of players in the category, I would have checked myself but as there were more than 80, I was going to let the bot do what was necessary. If the player is already in the parent category, the bot will just remove the youth team category and that will be it. Hope this makes sense. Bencherlite 12:19, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
- No problem. Bencherlite 12:22, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
- Ah, now I've not seen / heard of that before. I thought that the bot didn't add duplicate categories. I'll ask the bot op. Bencherlite 12:34, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
- User talk:Cyde#Cydebot repeating a category on a CFD merger. Bencherlite 12:38, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Wikify
I removed the Wikify template as it is deprecated and has been for several months now. The Wikify tag has been placed there due to a lack of internal links, and the Dead End tag already alerts editors to this fact. I admit that I should have mentioned this in the edit summary however. 130.88.141.34 (talk) 13:21, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
Thanks
Cheers for sorting that out, God knows what happened there. I think that might have put paid to me ever getting the bit back if I wanted it haha. Thanks again, BigDom (talk) 19:08, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
Zen-like
|
Zen-like |
| For keeping calm in face of constant antagonism from a user who fails to understand or chooses not to understand policies. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 19:34, 8 November 2012 (UTC) |