Talk:Aruna Roy: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 11:46, 15 November 2012 editMorelMWilliam (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users2,215 edits →Sections blankings by User:RobertRosen ← Previous edit		Revision as of 12:25, 15 November 2012 edit undoRobertRosen (talk \| contribs)675 edits →Sections blankings by User:RobertRosen Next edit →
Line 31:		Line 31:
	:There is no way that I am NOW going to discuss these Aruna Roy article issues repeatedly. From the very beginning I asked MWilliams to discuss it on the article's talk page and go through all the standard hierarchial DRs if necessary. He was openly dismissive and sarcastic about WP talk and DR policies. Now with all his vexatious litigation (WP:DRN, WP:BLPN, AP:ANI, WP:RSN etc.) having failed and considering he forced me to winkle out his past track record as a disruptive sock it is impossible for me to discuss the same disputes in GOOD FAITH. Unlike MWilliams I have no "ownership" issues with any page or this one in particular. It makes no difference to me if vandals screw the encyclopedia simply because all the good editors are sleeping. I am already an Admin (and a super-Admin) at far superior open edit access information resources & which only have properly verified editors (we don't let in riff-raff) and I don't give a f*** what happens here anymore. '''There is a finality termed as res-judicata. It means that after having exhausted all appeal remedies, editors are estopped from starting the trial process all over again.''' For you User:MWilliams it simply means that neither you nor any sock of yours should touch this page in future. Misplaced Pages is a big ocean, go swim elsewhere. For instance, lets talk at ], that is one BIG article with many problems & dubious refs which need immediate fixing. ] (]) 10:57, 15 November 2012 (UTC)		:There is no way that I am NOW going to discuss these Aruna Roy article issues repeatedly. From the very beginning I asked MWilliams to discuss it on the article's talk page and go through all the standard hierarchial DRs if necessary. He was openly dismissive and sarcastic about WP talk and DR policies. Now with all his vexatious litigation (WP:DRN, WP:BLPN, AP:ANI, WP:RSN etc.) having failed and considering he forced me to winkle out his past track record as a disruptive sock it is impossible for me to discuss the same disputes in GOOD FAITH. Unlike MWilliams I have no "ownership" issues with any page or this one in particular. It makes no difference to me if vandals screw the encyclopedia simply because all the good editors are sleeping. I am already an Admin (and a super-Admin) at far superior open edit access information resources & which only have properly verified editors (we don't let in riff-raff) and I don't give a f*** what happens here anymore. '''There is a finality termed as res-judicata. It means that after having exhausted all appeal remedies, editors are estopped from starting the trial process all over again.''' For you User:MWilliams it simply means that neither you nor any sock of yours should touch this page in future. Misplaced Pages is a big ocean, go swim elsewhere. For instance, lets talk at ], that is one BIG article with many problems & dubious refs which need immediate fixing. ] (]) 10:57, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
	::Stay cool. You never addressed the main issues and were always tangential. The ] lost its focus after you brought in irrelevant and unasked for details into it. Kindly stay focussed on what was asked for and lets try to achieve consensus that way. ]] 11:46, 15 November 2012 (UTC)		::Stay cool. You never addressed the main issues and were always tangential. The ] lost its focus after you brought in irrelevant and unasked for details into it. Kindly stay focussed on what was asked for and lets try to achieve consensus that way. ]] 11:46, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

			:::1) Never post on my talk page again. 2) Kindly amend each and every criticism / negative portrayal of me or my past edit actions at Misplaced Pages on this talk page IMMEDIATELY. 3) Take note that there is no Misplaced Pages procedure left for you to compel me "to lets start over" after you have exhausted all your appeal remedies. 4) Don't make bad faith accusations against me. As a former sockmaster who has continued to abuse and disruptively edit against several other editors besides me after being given a 2nd chance the presumption of AGF is against you and in my favour. 5) '''FINALLY:''' as a token of my good wishes / faith for your future edits, if you still feel inclined to fulfill your fantasy of talking obsessively with strangers on Wikipages I can suggest a good alternative. I'll have a chat with 10 of my friends at my own Wikisite highly recommending your Good Article (you know which one), and they'll probably all have a chat with 10 of their friends over here to see how they can all help you improve it collaboratively. ] (]) 12:25, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:25, 15 November 2012

Biography Unassessed

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.

India: Politics Stub‑class Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian politics workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in April 2012.

It is requested that an image or photograph of Aruna Roy be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in India may be able to help!
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Image

Flickr image, though looking for a better image! --Ekabhishek (talk) 07:57, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Sections blankings by User:RobertRosen

Hello! Lets start over! Let me list your acts of section blanking.

Act 1 : Your reason for blanking the sections added by Administrater Ekabhishek was "removed. Copyvio. section entirely sourced from copyrighted website." What do you mean by this? Both WP:Copy-paste and {WP:Close paraphrasing]] don't seem to apply here. Elaborate here. _morelM W 05:36, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Act 2 : Your reason for blanking the sections added by User:MorelMWilliam was "Dubious self published source. Deleted text contradicted by source". What contradicts what? What is dubious? How is it dubious? What supports your allegation that it is dubious? Any notable/ reliable source? _morelM W 05:36, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Act 3 : Your reason for blanking the sections added by User:MorelMWilliam was "deleted section. WP:IRS, WP:BLP The biography of Roy by Kalow-Tirol is based on unspecified "audio tape recordings" and letters and correspondences with people close to Roy." Elaborate the context. Even if the source gets classified as a self published, WP:ABOUTSELF allows addition of content from such sources for articles about themselves, as explained to you by User:Anonymous209.6 at the WP:RSN discussion. The best way is to list the controversial facts and the sources that claim that they are controversial. We shall see what we can based on that. _morelM W 05:36, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Act 4 : Your reason for blanking the sections added by User:MorelMWilliam was "There is an inconclusive WP:DR process underway initiated by M.Williams at WP:RSN". Explain your rationale. Why is it that you find this addition decontructive? _morelM W 05:36, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Your problems with Aruna's marriage with Bunker Roy. Here is where you should list the sources that claim that their marriage is 'illegal' or 'controversial'. _morelM W 05:36, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Let us stick to the issues listed above to prevent us from veering towards personal attacks. You might find it easier to respond next to each point. _morelM W 05:36, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

There is no way that I am NOW going to discuss these Aruna Roy article issues repeatedly. From the very beginning I asked MWilliams to discuss it on the article's talk page and go through all the standard hierarchial DRs if necessary. He was openly dismissive and sarcastic about WP talk and DR policies. Now with all his vexatious litigation (WP:DRN, WP:BLPN, AP:ANI, WP:RSN etc.) having failed and considering he forced me to winkle out his past track record as a disruptive sock it is impossible for me to discuss the same disputes in GOOD FAITH. Unlike MWilliams I have no "ownership" issues with any page or this one in particular. It makes no difference to me if vandals screw the encyclopedia simply because all the good editors are sleeping. I am already an Admin (and a super-Admin) at far superior open edit access information resources & which only have properly verified editors (we don't let in riff-raff) and I don't give a f*** what happens here anymore. There is a finality termed as res-judicata. It means that after having exhausted all appeal remedies, editors are estopped from starting the trial process all over again. For you User:MWilliams it simply means that neither you nor any sock of yours should touch this page in future. Misplaced Pages is a big ocean, go swim elsewhere. For instance, lets talk at Korkoro, that is one BIG article with many problems & dubious refs which need immediate fixing. RobertRosen (talk) 10:57, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Stay cool. You never addressed the main issues and were always tangential. The WP:ANI lost its focus after you brought in irrelevant and unasked for details into it. Kindly stay focussed on what was asked for and lets try to achieve consensus that way. _morelM W 11:46, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

1) Never post on my talk page again. 2) Kindly amend each and every criticism / negative portrayal of me or my past edit actions at Misplaced Pages on this talk page IMMEDIATELY. 3) Take note that there is no Misplaced Pages procedure left for you to compel me "to lets start over" after you have exhausted all your appeal remedies. 4) Don't make bad faith accusations against me. As a former sockmaster who has continued to abuse and disruptively edit against several other editors besides me after being given a 2nd chance the presumption of AGF is against you and in my favour. 5) FINALLY: as a token of my good wishes / faith for your future edits, if you still feel inclined to fulfill your fantasy of talking obsessively with strangers on Wikipages I can suggest a good alternative. I'll have a chat with 10 of my friends at my own Wikisite highly recommending your Good Article (you know which one), and they'll probably all have a chat with 10 of their friends over here to see how they can all help you improve it collaboratively. RobertRosen (talk) 12:25, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Categories: