| Revision as of 22:52, 1 December 2011 editShimmin Beg (talk | contribs)338 editsm Interwiki← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:47, 26 November 2012 edit undoInvertzoo (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers91,672 edits Tweak textNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| :''This article is not about formal ]; it describes terms that are sometimes used but have no standing under the ].'' | :''This article is not about formal ]; it describes terms that are sometimes used but have no standing under the ].'' | ||
| ⚫ | In zoology the term '''''forma''''' (literally Latin for '''form''') is |
||
| ⚫ | In ] the term '''''forma''''' (literally Latin for '''form''') is a strictly informal term that is sometimes used to describe organisms; under the '']'' the term has no standing (it is not accepted). In other words, the term has no ] significance at all. | ||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | Some zoologists use the word "form" or "forma" to describe variation in animals, especially ]s, as part of a series of terms and abbreviations that are appended to the ] or ]. Many 'typical specimens' may be described, but none should be considered absolute, unconditional or categorical. Forms have no official status, though they are sometimes useful in describing altitudinal or geographical ]s. As opposed to ]s (see below), a ] usually consists of a single form only at any given point of time. | ||
| ''forma geographica'' - f. geogr. | ''forma geographica'' - f. geogr. | ||
Revision as of 22:47, 26 November 2012
- This article is not about formal zoological nomenclature; it describes terms that are sometimes used but have no standing under the ICZN.
In zoology the term forma (literally Latin for form) is a strictly informal term that is sometimes used to describe organisms; under the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature the term has no standing (it is not accepted). In other words, the term has no taxonomic significance at all.
Some zoologists use the word "form" or "forma" to describe variation in animals, especially insects, as part of a series of terms and abbreviations that are appended to the binomen or trinomen. Many 'typical specimens' may be described, but none should be considered absolute, unconditional or categorical. Forms have no official status, though they are sometimes useful in describing altitudinal or geographical clines. As opposed to morphs (see below), a subpopulation usually consists of a single form only at any given point of time.
forma geographica - f. geogr.
- If used, nowadays usually denotes a part of a cline; for example for intergrades between subspecies in their area of contact.
forma localis - f. loc.
- As "f. geogr." but only local, more restricted in occurrence. See also small population size.
forma alta - f. alt.
- Altitudinal features are not necessarily inherited, but may entirely be due to environment. The same applies to temperature or humidity-generated forms, such as:
forma vernalis - f. vern. (spring form)
forma aestivalis - f. aest. (summer form)
forma autumnalis - f. autumn. (autumn form)
aberratio - ab.
- May be used for a single individual, for a small group such as an individual and its offspring, or for atypical individuals (for example, albinos).
- Also used for commonly observed forms of a species, but in this case use of forma (f.) or morpha, accompanied by a descriptive name, is more conventional.
Notes:
- A morph is a similar concept with a less restricted occurrence (see also Polymorphism). As neither forms nor morphs are officially recognised terminology in zoology, application can vary but, generally, morphs occur without geographical or seasonal restriction, and may constitute a significant part of the population; usually, several morphs co-occur in a single subpopulation at a given time. The peppered moth is a famous example.
- Botanical nomenclature is much more complex, with the use of varieties, subvarieties, and forms being formally regulated by the ICBN.