| Revision as of 11:05, 29 November 2012 editStalwart111 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers16,939 edits →Jean-Nicolas Lemmens← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:27, 1 December 2012 edit undoHijiri88 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users37,390 edits →Re: TN's behaviour: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 178: | Line 178: | ||
| ::No worries - deserved some attention. ]] 10:56, 29 November 2012 (UTC) | ::No worries - deserved some attention. ]] 10:56, 29 November 2012 (UTC) | ||
| == Re: TN's behaviour == | |||
| Hey Stalwart! :D | |||
| I'm sorry to contact you over this again, but I am getting increasingly frustrated over this user harassing me over so many articles. It seems like any time I have a minor editing dispute with any editor he will jump in to join that editor against me, but his arguments are always ad hominem, never based on reliable sources. As you saw, I tried taking your advice and posting him on ANI, but after almost a week I have received no response, and was told again that my princess was in another castle. Again. | |||
| It was suggested that I take it to ]. I have previously been put off by their insistence on two or more users having attempted to address the problem, and since it is mostly a problem of him harassing ''me'' that was difficult. But I think your pointing out (no pun) his ]Y issues may qualify. Any chance you would be willing to help me put together an RFC on this? | |||
| ] (]) 15:27, 1 December 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:27, 1 December 2012
 | |
| Misplaced Pages ads | file info – show another – #232 |
| This is Stalwart111's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
 |
|---|
| 24 December 2024 |
|
Welcome!
Please feel free to leave a note if you need to get in touch with me.
A barnstar for you!
|
The Barnstar of Diligence |
| For your great work at the whole New Zealand Radio station thing. Shirt58 (talk) 13:06, 24 September 2012 (UTC) |
Chivalry Now
As much as I hate prodding people who agree with me (joke) - this message seems like it'll sort of raise the temperature rather than lower it. Can I ask you to tone it down a bit? :). Ironholds (talk) 21:18, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
- Welll... maybe. Ha ha. Responded here. Cheers, Stalwart111 (talk) 21:41, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
Hello again, Stalwart111. I still believe that the “Chivalry-Now” movement is worthy of inclusion in Misplaced Pages. Instead of writing an article about the group that mentions the book, would it be less objectionable to write an article about the book (perhaps mentioning the group)? I had absolutely nothing to do with the book, it being published almost three years before I found it or the group. Thanks for your input, Sg647112c (talk) 16:55, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
A "Barnstar" for your efforts!
|
The Anti-Spam Barnstar | |
| This is just the most appropriate one I could find to award you for your help in the recent AfD debate at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Tanka prose. Misplaced Pages is better off without that "promotional" page, and I hope I can look forward to working with you again to remove spam/self-promotion from other Misplaced Pages articles. elvenscout742 (talk) 06:58, 15 October 2012 (UTC) |
A barnstar for you!
|
The Original Barnstar |
| Thanks for your very helpful input on Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Solidcam - correct result in the end and the most amazing and shamless plugs from the various puppets! Brookie :) { - he's in the building somewhere!} 10:48, 16 October 2012 (UTC) |
A barnstar for you!
|
The Editor's Barnstar |
| Great job fixing the article on Patricia Cloherty. Bearian (talk) 22:17, 16 October 2012 (UTC) |
Talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
More spam
Hey, I have a question regarding deletion requests. Since you were so helpful in researching the sources behind "tanka prose" last time I figured it would be faster to ask your advice than to post a comment on a talk page in the Misplaced Pages namespace and wait for someone to notice it.
I recently noticed another somewhat irrelevant, spammish article at Gogyōshi and posted it for deletion. I tagged it as being "Japan" and "poetry"-related, but in five days no one has posted anything but me. I sent notices to the article's creator/sole significant contributor User:Rappelle-toi and User:Bagworm, who had previously posted it for deletion. That deletion request had ended with "no consensus" because after a week those two users remained the only ones who had commented. Does this often happen? If so, what does one do to remedy it? My concerns about the article will still be valid if the discussion gets closed with no one responding but me, but I don't know how to get any interest in the deletion request.
Also, on a somewhat related note, the WP:SPA who defended the "tanka prose" article has continued posting Woodward links elsewhere on Misplaced Pages (mainly to haibun, which is an article about an early-modern Japanese genre that now deals almost exclusively with modern American literature). He and one other user have basically refused to defend their position with anything other than "there are two of us and one of you, so we are the CONSENSUS" and "English haibun exists, as these journals are self-evidence; therefore, we must cover it extensively in this article". They have only cited the same obscure sources as before, but since it is a content-dispute rather than a deletion request, and "haibun" as a term at the very least does exist, I am not really sure how to deal with this.
Any advice you could offer on either of these issues would be highly appreciated. :D
elvenscout742 (talk) 06:38, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
- Responded here. Cheers, Stalwart111 (talk) 23:30, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
Colombo Racecourse Airstrip
Hello, could you come and let me know what you think we might do regarding this article, at User talk:Obi2canibe#Colombo Racecourse? Many thanks, Splash - tk 22:54, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
- No worries, responded there. Cheers, Stalwart111 (talk) 23:30, 4 November 2012 (UTC).
Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Submitmaster
Just FYI, I opened a SPI stemming from the deletion discussion where you pointed out well-grounded suspicions. --Batard0 (talk) 13:55, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
- Good call, will comment there. Cheers, Stalwart111 (talk) 22:08, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
Note
You are right... in many things, your note was appreciated (thanks). But, please I’d like to ask you..:
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Eka-bismuth (talk) 14:18, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
- No worries. Not sure what your question is but I have responded here. Cheers, Stalwart111 23:19, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Raimondo Montecuccoli
I checked the two citations that you added to Raimondo Montecuccoli the page you cited in the first one was not accessible to me, but the second one Paoletti,p. 128 does not seem to be about the subject. Please could you check to see if I have made a mistake. -- PBS (talk) 21:46, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
- Ah an easy mistake to make when the page of the first book was in the 100s. Access to certain pages in Google books depends on the country in which one makes the request (a bit like the regional numbers on CD and DVD players). I have removed the verification template as that is no longer correct, and I have fiddled with the link of the other page so that it is visible where I am at the moment, and it should still also work in Australia. -- PBS (talk) 09:25, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
Enredados
How I hate having to look into this sort of thing! Yes I would agree that the edits over the last month or so do look like those of user:LouisPhilippeCharles (LPC). However the article that user:Enredados mentions (Carlo Emanuele Ruspoli) was created by user:G.-M. Cupertino another sockmaster who edits in the same area. As edits to Carlo Emanuele Ruspoli involved user:FactStraight who at the time (May this year) thought that Enredados was a sock of LPC, it might be worth asking FactStraight's opinion as well.
Are you aware of stalker/ -- The first number pair tell you how many editor have edited a page then comes the editors who have edited the page. It is a useful tool but be ware of placing to much reliance it for deriving socks as for example we have have both edited 29 pages ranging from the University of Wollongong through to Brigandage.
-- PBS (talk) 14:30, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
Pirouz Davani
I was under the impression press releases weren't RS because they are primary sources. MSJapan (talk) 05:51, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
- Yeah, it does, but that was part of the reason I was having trouble establishing notability - there's an awful lot of supposition in some of those pieces, and I also get the sense that Davani himself isn't notable except as an example of a larger problem. MSJapan (talk) 07:54, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
On Notability
Hi. I enjoyed reading your article on notability especially your example of the little African Village. I realized that if I applied those parameters, indeed, the article New Rural Bank of Binalbagan, Inc. failed miserably to meet the criteria. First of all, there are not enough sources (online) to link and verify the reliability of the information. Second, as you've said, Misplaced Pages tends to lean towards western culture. References in Ilonggo (local dialect) or Tagalog (national language) are so few and far between and if they do exist, no one outside the country would understand. The only articles available online that I could use are from the Municipality itself (http://www.binalbagan.gov.ph/economy/), Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas page (http://www.bsp.gov.ph/banking/directory.asp?paging=prev&Start=140&Offset=20&BankName=&Address=&InstitutionTypeID=12&submit=Find&ctr=181&i=20) or our organizational page Rural Banker's Association of the Philippines (http://www.rbap.org/members/locate-rural-bank/visayas/region-6/negros-occidental/) The Wiki page was only created as a link to the http://en.wikipedia.org/List_of_banks_in_the_Philippines#Negros_Occidental. Being a Rural Bank Awardee of the Year for 1979 in the Philippines does not seem to count enough. I do hope I could add more images and articles but only seasoned Wikipedians are allowed to. If new sources do crop up in the future is reopening the page still eligible? Thanks. Nrbbi (talk) 07:46, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
- No worries, responded here. Stalwart111 23:10, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
WP:ANI for Tristan noir
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. elvenscout742 (talk) 10:59, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
- All good, responded there. Cheers, Stalwart111 22:59, 27 November 2012 (UTC).
RE:ANI
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
- No worries! Stalwart111 22:59, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
AFD NAC
Ye are all set sir. §FreeRangeFrog 07:04, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
- Brilliant. Stalwart111 22:59, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 13:00, 27 November 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Vacation 13:00, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
- All good. Stalwart111 22:59, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
Your request for rollback
Hi Stalwart111. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
- Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
- Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
- Rollback should never be used to edit war.
- If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
- Use common sense.
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Misplaced Pages:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Mifter (talk) 00:02, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
- Oh, new tools. Most excellent. That was very quick (only posted yesterday). Many thanks! Stalwart111 00:06, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
Jean-Nicolas Lemmens
Thank you so much for your great help with the above mentioned page ! I very much appreciate it.
Thanks and regards,
Glemmens1940 (talk) 09:54, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
- No worries - deserved some attention. Stalwart111 10:56, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
Re: TN's behaviour
Hey Stalwart! :D
I'm sorry to contact you over this again, but I am getting increasingly frustrated over this user harassing me over so many articles. It seems like any time I have a minor editing dispute with any editor he will jump in to join that editor against me, but his arguments are always ad hominem, never based on reliable sources. As you saw, I tried taking your advice and posting him on ANI, but after almost a week I have received no response, and was told again that my princess was in another castle. Again.
It was suggested that I take it to WP:RFC/U. I have previously been put off by their insistence on two or more users having attempted to address the problem, and since it is mostly a problem of him harassing me that was difficult. But I think your pointing out (no pun) his WP:POINTY issues here may qualify. Any chance you would be willing to help me put together an RFC on this?