Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 06:37, 5 December 2012

Archived to 3

Random thought: Good thing about wikipedia is that vandals may buzz around like flies, but the admins can easily take care of them with a simple page protect, especially if they hide behind anonymous IPs;D

Talkback

The IP editor who has filed this ANI report has requested I ask you for your input, as you were involved in the last ANI against Lgdp. Strange Passerby (talk • cont) 01:48, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

Weird revert

Hi on Tony Tan Keng Yam I didn't get your reason for the removal of the cited remarks from the Library of Congress Country Studies; I believe that it's good to clarify for readers (who would not know) the background behind labor relations in Singapore. Did you mean to take away something else? elle _{vécut heureuse} (be free) 01:48, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

Hi, I have copied your question to the article page and answered it there. Zhanzhao (talk) 16:04, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

OpenInfoForAll (talk) 05:27, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

Request for arbitration

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests#Astroturfing on Singaporean politics and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—

• Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests#Requests for Arbitration;
• Misplaced Pages:Arbitration guide.

Thanks,

Posted on behalf of filing party User:La goutte de pluie by Arbitration Committee clerk Alexandr Dmitri (talk) 13:38, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

WP:AN

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. ~~Ebe123~~ (+)
_Contribs 21:18, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Arbitration

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests#User:La goutte de pluie and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—

• Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests#Requests for Arbitration;
• Misplaced Pages:Arbitration guide.

Thanks,OpenInfoForAll (talk) 22:47, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Actually

i am autistic woman with grammer problmes by --Sunuraju (talk) 12:16, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

I am sorry to hear that. No offense, but your previous edit was really not making sense, and for the benefit of Misplaced Pages users, I had to revert to the last known edit that made more sense. Zhanzhao (talk) 15:59, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Vivian Balakrishnan

Hi Zhanzhao, I have recently rewritten parts of the article mentioned above. I see that you were involved in discussions about the article earlier. I would like to understand the context of the dispute in the section listed under:

• Talk:Vivian Balakrishnan#language of the whole video affair.

I would appreciate your help with expanding the articles on Vivian Balakrishnan and Grace Fu. Thanks. — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 11:44, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi Nick, I am not as active as I used to be but I'll see what I can do. Cheers Zhanzhao (talk) 01:37, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

deletion of Belinda Ang

Hi,

I am rather surprised by the proposal for deletion. A High Court judge (which is what she is), under the constitution, and basically under any conception of separation of powers, is to the judiciary what a minister is to the executive/legislature. One could say the article is stubby, to denounce notability is absurd. Moreover, the notability guideline is rather clear on this. Chensiyuan (talk) 10:09, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

The way see it is that although the post is important, the subject is not, nor notable. Based on the content of the article, there is barely any writeup on the subject in in respect to her post. I hope you see where I am coming from. Zhanzhao (talk) 10:19, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Sure, I'll beef it up. Chensiyuan (talk) 10:23, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Wee Shu Min elitism controversy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wee Shu Min elitism controversy is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Wee Shu Min elitism controversy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 11:17, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Quick question

• Just who is the banned user who posted Joy Tong's study on the article page of CHC? --Dave 11:11, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

You can see it from the Page analysis function, a user called La goutte de pluie. As identified by DanS76 in the CHC talk page. In fact her last act, the one that got her banned, was to stalk another editor that got into an arguement with her and twist that guy's edit. Even more glaring when you realize LGDP only edits Singapore or science articles, and the CHC article was the only exception during that time frame. Basically the CHC article became collatoral damage for her disagreements with me. Zhanzhao (talk) 14:54, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

The study was added and pushed by her around Aug 27, 2011. Around that time, she was involved in this ]. And to give more context, she used to be an admin with questionable COI issues and I was the first to raise it in ANI] so I can understand why she was stalking me. i was not the first one she "stalked", nor was this the 1st article she tried to "punish" whitewashing i.e. see the Vivan Balakrishnan article and talk page. Zhanzhao (talk) 15:09, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

• Now that explains everything, thanks. --Dave 19:48, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

The Olive Branch: A Dispute Resolution Newsletter (Issue #1)

Welcome to the first edition of The Olive Branch. This will be a place to semi-regularly update editors active in dispute resolution (DR) about some of the most important issues, advances, and challenges in the area. You were delivered this update because you are active in DR, but if you would prefer not to receive any future mailing, just add your name to this page.

In this issue:

• Background: A brief overview of the DR ecosystem.
• Research: The most recent DR data
• Survey results: Highlights from Steven Zhang's April 2012 survey
• Activity analysis: Where DR happened, broken down by the top DR forums
• DR Noticeboard comparison: How the newest DR forum has progressed between May and August
• Discussion update: Checking up on the Wikiquette Assistance close debate
• Proposal: It's time to close the Geopolitical, ethnic, and religious conflicts noticeboard. Agree or disagree?

--The Olive Branch 19:40, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Misplaced Pages talk:Articles for creation/Tiny Island Productions.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Misplaced Pages! Ben Hudson (talk) 23:09, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Hmmm...

Hi Zhanzhao, I'm just curious. Why didn't you warn the vandal who vandalised Singapore national football team? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arctic Kangaroo (talk • contribs) 04:49, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

It was an IP editor, based on past experience most of the time it does not work. Zhanzhao (talk) 05:40, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Well...I see. New thing that I learned from you today. :) Arctic Kangaroo (talk) 06:37, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Sorry, I completely missed your reply at the AfC help desk. The short of it: I expect the draft will pass the next review, but I'd try and find a substitute for the press release. Good work! Huon (talk) 04:58, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for your suggestions and assist! Zhanzhao (talk) 05:39, 5 December 2012 (UTC)