Revision as of 18:40, 28 December 2012 editPigsonthewing (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors266,668 edits →Infobox: new section← Previous edit |
Revision as of 21:05, 28 December 2012 edit undoMoonraker (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers114,137 edits →InfoboxNext edit → |
Line 9: |
Line 9: |
|
|
|
|
|
The Infobox, which I recently added to this article, has been removed with no other reason given than "rm, please gain consensus before re-adding". It should be restored. <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">]</span> (<span class="nickname">Pigsonthewing</span>); ]; ]</span> 18:40, 28 December 2012 (UTC) |
|
The Infobox, which I recently added to this article, has been removed with no other reason given than "rm, please gain consensus before re-adding". It should be restored. <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">]</span> (<span class="nickname">Pigsonthewing</span>); ]; ]</span> 18:40, 28 December 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
:I don't have a strong view either way, but I doubt the benefits. The infobox which was added has a non-free image of Edda as a child of four (which is on the page anyway and which isn't terribly good for giving an "at a glance" summary of a 74-year-old), plus links to Edda's parents, who are linked in the lead already. The subject isn't complicated, and I think some benefit would need to be suggested. Or is there a policy which supports infoboxes in any event? ] (]) 21:05, 28 December 2012 (UTC) |