Revision as of 07:54, 7 January 2013 editWwwhatsup (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers10,373 editsm →Punkcast: grammar fixes← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:40, 7 January 2013 edit undoMarioNovi (talk | contribs)770 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
*'''Keep'''. It's true I have a direct interest. In the essential aspects I stuck strictly to secondary referenced material, and generally to NPOV. I would hope that notability is established by the two Village Voice Best awards and the use of Punkcast material to launch the WNYC NY Noise tv program. Also I have added to the article that a large exhibit of Punkcast was used to launch the FILMER LA MUSIQUE series in Paris in 2007. So, if one uses the same notability criteria as ] I think the article should pass. ] (]) 05:27, 7 January 2013 (UTC) | *'''Keep'''. It's true I have a direct interest. In the essential aspects I stuck strictly to secondary referenced material, and generally to NPOV. I would hope that notability is established by the two Village Voice Best awards and the use of Punkcast material to launch the WNYC NY Noise tv program. Also I have added to the article that a large exhibit of Punkcast was used to launch the FILMER LA MUSIQUE series in Paris in 2007. So, if one uses the same notability criteria as ] I think the article should pass. ] (]) 05:27, 7 January 2013 (UTC) | ||
*'''Note''' While any AfD stands or falls on its merits, if you look at the ] of the nominator, it would appear to be a ], what's more an inexpert one. I suspect some payback as I've done some tagging in my time.. ] (]) 06:29, 7 January 2013 (UTC) | *'''Note''' While any AfD stands or falls on its merits, if you look at the ] of the nominator, it would appear to be a ], what's more an inexpert one. I suspect some payback as I've done some tagging in my time.. ] (]) 06:29, 7 January 2013 (UTC) | ||
**Hello Wwwwhatsup. I don't think that I terribly need to respond but I will. Whether I have edited before without a username isn't relevent, but the instructions for deletion say that "You must sign in to nominate pages for deletion. If you do not sign-in, or you edit anonymously, you will get stuck part way through the nomination procedure." Why are you pointing this out, if you say "any AfD stands or falls on its merits" then why even mention it? If I have a motive for doing this it isn't stronger than your motive for creating the article. I'm sorry if you feel like you have that many enemies here but accusing me like that I don't think helps you. If I do have a COI as you do it does not matter. If someone with a COI nominates an article for deletion out of spite and it shouldn't be deleted then no one will vote delete. That's the wikipedia's protection. If someone with a COI creates an article about their business and is the only editor, then anyone can nominate the article, and it will be at AFD. That's wikipedia's protection. Everything is going like it should. There's no reason to accuse me of spite because if my AFD had no merit it would get all keeps. Or am I wrong here, you're right I'm not that seasoned. If I'm wrong please tell me. Now I wish I didn't do this because people are accusing each other alot. I'm sorry if I seem angrered but I feel that you're accusing me. If the article's improved the it shouldn't be deleted that is obvious. But it seems like no one else edited it alot and it doesn't have alot of good sources. So I hope people see why I did it. Doesn't a company need more than a few passing mentions? A reason I nominated this article is because I realized that lots of sources listed, which are not really even good sources,were added years after the article was created,which also looks weird. I'm sorry for my long reply. I copied it in two places too. ] (]) 09:40, 7 January 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 09:40, 7 January 2013
Punkcast
AfDs for this article:- Punkcast (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This page seems to read like an advertisement. There is only one major contributor, WWWwhatsup,whereas if you Google punkcast, the first link says it is sponsored by WWWwhatsup. MarioNovi (talk) 00:31, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete, sort of per WP:WEB but especially per WP:CSB. We are trying to create an encyclopedia here people. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 00:35, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 15:37, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 15:37, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 15:37, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- Keep. It's true I have a direct interest. In the essential aspects I stuck strictly to secondary referenced material, and generally to NPOV. I would hope that notability is established by the two Village Voice Best awards and the use of Punkcast material to launch the WNYC NY Noise tv program. Also I have added to the article that a large exhibit of Punkcast was used to launch the FILMER LA MUSIQUE series in Paris in 2007. So, if one uses the same notability criteria as WP:MUSIC I think the article should pass. Wwwhatsup (talk) 05:27, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
- Note While any AfD stands or falls on its merits, if you look at the contribs of the nominator, it would appear to be a WP:SPA, what's more an inexpert one. I suspect some payback as I've done some tagging in my time.. Wwwhatsup (talk) 06:29, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
- Hello Wwwwhatsup. I don't think that I terribly need to respond but I will. Whether I have edited before without a username isn't relevent, but the instructions for deletion say that "You must sign in to nominate pages for deletion. If you do not sign-in, or you edit anonymously, you will get stuck part way through the nomination procedure." Why are you pointing this out, if you say "any AfD stands or falls on its merits" then why even mention it? If I have a motive for doing this it isn't stronger than your motive for creating the article. I'm sorry if you feel like you have that many enemies here but accusing me like that I don't think helps you. If I do have a COI as you do it does not matter. If someone with a COI nominates an article for deletion out of spite and it shouldn't be deleted then no one will vote delete. That's the wikipedia's protection. If someone with a COI creates an article about their business and is the only editor, then anyone can nominate the article, and it will be at AFD. That's wikipedia's protection. Everything is going like it should. There's no reason to accuse me of spite because if my AFD had no merit it would get all keeps. Or am I wrong here, you're right I'm not that seasoned. If I'm wrong please tell me. Now I wish I didn't do this because people are accusing each other alot. I'm sorry if I seem angrered but I feel that you're accusing me. If the article's improved the it shouldn't be deleted that is obvious. But it seems like no one else edited it alot and it doesn't have alot of good sources. So I hope people see why I did it. Doesn't a company need more than a few passing mentions? A reason I nominated this article is because I realized that lots of sources listed, which are not really even good sources,were added years after the article was created,which also looks weird. I'm sorry for my long reply. I copied it in two places too. MarioNovi (talk) 09:40, 7 January 2013 (UTC)