| Revision as of 22:56, 13 January 2013 edit24.130.156.204 (talk) →No content removed← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:58, 13 January 2013 edit undo24.130.156.204 (talk) →Alt medNext edit → | ||
| Line 104: | Line 104: | ||
| Content was moved from the wrong section into the right section. I copied the content to the correct section, rewording bullet points into English sentences. I went back and deleted it after it was moved. No content was deleted. If it appears to be deleted, please read the new first few sentences in the section first paragraph, and you will find the stats in English language style. (At the time of yor revert, the info specific to regulation in Texas was in the process of being moved to a new section specific to Texas, but in the correct section topic, which is "regulation", not "prevalence of use". (I wouldn't dare delete content altogether, since in that article, doing so would be immediately undone by one of the two "sides" there . (I am on the "science side", but I am editing NPOV, by not deleting anything, just correctly placing it). Please let me know if this fails to address your concerns, since I am just about done editing the prevalence of use section, which previously repeated much of he same info, or had offtopic material that needed to be moved to other sections. Thanks. ] (]) 22:56, 13 January 2013 (UTC) | Content was moved from the wrong section into the right section. I copied the content to the correct section, rewording bullet points into English sentences. I went back and deleted it after it was moved. No content was deleted. If it appears to be deleted, please read the new first few sentences in the section first paragraph, and you will find the stats in English language style. (At the time of yor revert, the info specific to regulation in Texas was in the process of being moved to a new section specific to Texas, but in the correct section topic, which is "regulation", not "prevalence of use". (I wouldn't dare delete content altogether, since in that article, doing so would be immediately undone by one of the two "sides" there . (I am on the "science side", but I am editing NPOV, by not deleting anything, just correctly placing it). Please let me know if this fails to address your concerns, since I am just about done editing the prevalence of use section, which previously repeated much of he same info, or had offtopic material that needed to be moved to other sections. Thanks. ] (]) 22:56, 13 January 2013 (UTC) | ||
| PS, if you start editing there, you might want to use an anon IP, not your username. This is so your edits, not you, are what is looked at by others. Your username won't win any barnstars editing from an anon IP like that, but it helps keep focus on content, not editors. ] (]) 22:58, 13 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:58, 13 January 2013
| This is Widr's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73Auto-archiving period: 7 days  |
Old tenant.
Sorry just got a message pop up from you about you reverting a "Betty Kirshaw" Misplaced Pages page. Thought i would just tell you that was probably the previous (or earlier) tenant of this house. Just moved in so that sort of thing is happening a lot. Ill stick on my personal account from now on but just so you know that's not me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.129.53.32 (talk) 19:46, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Nomination for merging of Template:Palestinian territory development
Template:Palestinian territory development has been nominated for merging with Template:Palestinian nationalism. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Greyshark09 (talk) 21:57, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
Edit to Martin Ssempa
Hello Widr,
On a number of occasions, Mr Ssempa has actually said this, and it is arguably his most well-known phrase, and as there was nothing on the page about it, I thought it should be inserted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mafufuray (talk • contribs) 10:28, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
No.
It has been proven he is a supporter of Tranmere Rovers, please get your sources right, i have researched this particualr topic to share with the world and you do thid — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.79.176.160 (talk) 19:51, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
I reverted your edit
Your reversion claimed I had not supplied an edit summary, which was not accurate. Feel free to reapply it in the unlikely case you disagree. Thanks. 67.101.5.32 (talk) 22:27, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
Missing Reference to Family Business page
Widr, I made a change to the family business page which was deleted. Alderson (2011) is cited twice in the wikipedia narrative. However, the reference which was there originally has been deleted.
I added the reference back in, and it has been deleted again?
Please add Alderson, K,. (2011). Understanding the Family Business. NY. Business Expert Press ISBN 9781606491690
Thank you Keanonalderson (talk) 19:07, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Stephen Levitt
http://www.freakonomics.com/2012/10/01/linda-levitt-jines-1962-2012/
Hi, I am a novice to editing Wiki and would not want to mess things up, but the link to the announcement is above and Mr Levitt also talked about his sister on the Freakonomics podcast today — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.129.179.113 (talk) 19:51, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
A beer for you!
|
cheers to my heinekin Spencer Kinkelaar (talk) 23:38, 10 January 2013 (UTC) |
Spencer Kinkelaar (talk) 23:38, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Bernie_S
Heyo,
What did I do wrong tagging that page? It's very very poorly formatted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.11.48.240 (talk) 00:21, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Floppy Disk
Sorry about that - looks like we were trying to revert the Floppy Disk page at the same time, and I made an arse of it... (To use a technical term...) I think that it's back to a sane version now.
Sjhill (talk) 00:36, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
University of Georgia edits
Hello Widr,
I see you undid some of my work on the University of Georgia page. I was not logged into my account. Please do not undo the corrections. They have been appropriately added. I am rearranging the page as part of a greater effort to revamp the page. Currently, the page has mislabeled facilities with academics and research. I swamped these two titles to better reflect content.
Thanks UGAMD (talk) 02:00, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
ISL stands for Irish Sign Language already. Italian Sign Language should remain LIS....
About the reversal I removed "ISL" because, simply put, when talking about sign language acronyms one usually uses the local acronyms, e.g. LSQ for Quebec Sign Language, LSF for French Sign Language and so on, not QSL nor FSL no matter what language one writes them in. The same should be for the acronym for "Italian Sign Language", which is LIS. Not ISL. Besides "ISL" is already in use by Irish Sign Language :p
That's all.
Best regards.
213.203.155.31 (talk) 18:32, 12 January 2013 (UTC) an Italian Deaf person that's too lazy and forgetful to really create a wiki account :)
2013 CR Vasco da Gama season
Well, I put it on the page by the fact that Campeonato Carioca, like other state championships, are very important for Brazilian football, and for Vasco da Gama, who in this moment plays a friendly against Ajax, isn't different . If you want to add something else in addition, help is very welcome!
PS.: I'm Brazilian, and sorry for my bad english!
BalbinoFelipe (talk) 19:58, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Alt med
Content was moved from the wrong section into the right section. I copied the content to the correct section, rewording bullet points into English sentences. I went back and deleted it after it was moved. No content was deleted. If it appears to be deleted, please read the new first few sentences in the section first paragraph, and you will find the stats in English language style. (At the time of yor revert, the info specific to regulation in Texas was in the process of being moved to a new section specific to Texas, but in the correct section topic, which is "regulation", not "prevalence of use". (I wouldn't dare delete content altogether, since in that article, doing so would be immediately undone by one of the two "sides" there . (I am on the "science side", but I am editing NPOV, by not deleting anything, just correctly placing it). Please let me know if this fails to address your concerns, since I am just about done editing the prevalence of use section, which previously repeated much of he same info, or had offtopic material that needed to be moved to other sections. Thanks. 24.130.156.204 (talk) 22:56, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
PS, if you start editing there, you might want to use an anon IP, not your username. This is so your edits, not you, are what is looked at by others. Your username won't win any barnstars editing from an anon IP like that, but it helps keep focus on content, not editors. 24.130.156.204 (talk) 22:58, 13 January 2013 (UTC)