Misplaced Pages

User talk:IIIraute: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:07, 15 January 2013 editIIIraute (talk | contribs)5,842 edits Mate,← Previous edit Revision as of 10:02, 15 January 2013 edit undoGuitar hero on the roof (talk | contribs)439 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 55: Line 55:
*No offence taken, its all in a good days fun around these parts. I also didn't mean to cause any, and I am grateful that you did speak the voice of reason during those two weeks. You may consider this message an apology for a few over-heated wordings and especially for ascribing you a viewpoint you apparently do not hold.]·] 02:02, 15 January 2013 (UTC) *No offence taken, its all in a good days fun around these parts. I also didn't mean to cause any, and I am grateful that you did speak the voice of reason during those two weeks. You may consider this message an apology for a few over-heated wordings and especially for ascribing you a viewpoint you apparently do not hold.]·] 02:02, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
::Thank you for your message. I'm happy to hear that. I think it was all a bit much for me - just look what happened at that talk-page during the last 10 days - superabominable! --] (]) 03:07, 15 January 2013 (UTC) ::Thank you for your message. I'm happy to hear that. I think it was all a bit much for me - just look what happened at that talk-page during the last 10 days - superabominable! --] (]) 03:07, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

==Trying to (finally) close the discussion with a conclusion==
Hi! Here’s what I wrote: .

Is there anything you would like to add? I tried to summarize it as much as possible, hope I didn’t skip anything worth mentioning! ] (]) 10:02, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:02, 15 January 2013

This is IIIraute's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 31 days 

Third Reich - Nazi Germany proclamation

The use of parentheses containing "(Nazi Germany)" after "Third Reich" in the sentence "...the Third Reich was proclaimed in 1933." is very suitable. You have undone this edit yet your argument is unjust. Since it is contained within parentheses it does not suggest that it was Nazi Germany that was proclaimed.

In fact, the term "Nazi Germany" is not used at all throughout the entire article regardless that it is the most commonly used term used to denote that era. As much as it was a disastrous part of history, it cannot be ignored. This is Misplaced Pages, not a propaganda tool - history must be given as it is, not as you'd like it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kupraios (talkcontribs) 15:01, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

please see: Talk:Germany --IIIraute (talk) 04:50, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Cloud Atlas

...4. btw, talk about violations - look at your talk page!-i am virtually flipping you off.--Norgizfox5041 (talk) 06:56, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

yes, btw, let's talk about violations - please say no more! thanks, --IIIraute (talk) 03:19, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cloud Atlas (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Central Germany (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Karl der Grosse

Why should we mention his German name and not his Flemish or Italian name? Or even his modern French name? Isn't the interwiki link to the German Misplaced Pages enough? Srnec (talk) 04:04, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

The reasons were discussed thoroughly -- see talk-archive → . Why do you think the Encyclopædia Britannica does mention his German name and not his Flemish or Italian name? --IIIraute (talk) 14:53, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Apology

Re-reading the discussion, I came to a conclusion I went out of line and said a lot of stuff which are not true. I saw it in a certain way and probably in the sub concious felt like any other way is an attack on the Jewish nation. I apologize because it's not true and the fact is you played a role in reaching the concensus, which shows I misjudged your whole intention in the discussion. I always "warm up" to fast in arguments, though it's not an excuse so I apologise. The stuff said about the German nation are also not true. As horrible as the holocaust was, it's not just the Germans who did it (to be fair, in Ukraine and the Baltics there were many local "volunteers"), and it is nothing the young generation needs to be blamed about. The fact is, according to the bible we did some similar stuff to others. Guitar hero on the roof (talk) 19:44, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Don't worry - apology accepted. I am happy we could solve this. --IIIraute (talk) 20:15, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Klinsmann

Hi Illraute, I'm not trying to be facetious, but I get Klinsmann in both the gallery and the file itself. It was still Hahn when I downloaded the file to exchange Einstein for someone else a few days ago, but now it is definitely Klinsmann as Germany coach 2005 (as I found out from the Klinsmann article). I don't know why it shows Otto Hahn on your computer and Klinsmann on mine, or how to fix it. Rainbowwrasse (talk) 20:05, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

On the Germans page, I can only see a black and white picture of Otto Hahn.--IIIraute (talk) 20:31, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Mate,

It seems those two weeks of debating might have taken a toll on you. You sure you're not burnt out? You might want to take a break for a day or two from that particular article since communicating with some of the other participants in the discussions so far must not have been easy. - Reanimated X (talk) 01:00, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

I think I will take your advice anytime soon. thanks. --IIIraute (talk) 01:15, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
Please don't modify archived discussions. Toddst1 (talk) 01:47, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
Sorry, such was not my intention - must have overlapped, time-wise.--IIIraute (talk) 01:52, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
...yes, 01:43 and 01:44. --IIIraute (talk) 01:57, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
  • No offence taken, its all in a good days fun around these parts. I also didn't mean to cause any, and I am grateful that you did speak the voice of reason during those two weeks. You may consider this message an apology for a few over-heated wordings and especially for ascribing you a viewpoint you apparently do not hold.·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 02:02, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for your message. I'm happy to hear that. I think it was all a bit much for me - just look what happened at that talk-page during the last 10 days - superabominable! --IIIraute (talk) 03:07, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Trying to (finally) close the discussion with a conclusion

Hi! Here’s what I wrote: .

Is there anything you would like to add? I tried to summarize it as much as possible, hope I didn’t skip anything worth mentioning! Guitar hero on the roof (talk) 10:02, 15 January 2013 (UTC)