Misplaced Pages

User talk:Alohamesamis: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:36, 9 January 2013 editAlohamesamis (talk | contribs)140 edits rm personal attack by troll← Previous edit Latest revision as of 19:27, 16 January 2013 edit undoX! (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators23,642 edits Adding sockpuppetry block notice per Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Alohamesamis 
Line 10: Line 10:


<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''1 month''' for ], as you did at ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by adding below this notice the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}}, but you should read the ] first.<p>During a dispute, you should first try to ] and seek ]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. &nbsp;] (]) 02:37, 8 January 2013 (UTC)</p></div><!-- Template:uw-ewblock --> <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''1 month''' for ], as you did at ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by adding below this notice the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}}, but you should read the ] first.<p>During a dispute, you should first try to ] and seek ]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. &nbsp;] (]) 02:37, 8 January 2013 (UTC)</p></div><!-- Template:uw-ewblock -->
== Blocked for sockpuppetry ==
{{tmbox
| style = background: #f8eaba;
| image = ]
| text = '''''This account has been ] ''''' from editing&#32;for a period of '''4 months''' for ] per evidence presented at ]. Note that multiple accounts are ], ''but'' using them for ] reasons '''is not'''. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to ]. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on the page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;}} below, but you should read the ] first. <small>(]&nbsp;·&nbsp;]) &nbsp;·&nbsp;] &nbsp;·&nbsp;</small> 19:27, 16 January 2013 (UTC)<!-- Template:SockBlock -->
}}

Latest revision as of 19:27, 16 January 2013

January 2013

Your recent editing history at In Bruges shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Theroadislong (talk) 21:37, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Since you just came off a two-week block for edit-warring on the same article, you should probably consider that the warning above is a final warning. Beyond My Ken (talk) 22:46, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Viriditas (talk) 11:33, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for edit warring, as you did at In Bruges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  Bbb23 (talk) 02:37, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 4 months for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Alohamesamis. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. (X! · talk)  · @852  ·  19:27, 16 January 2013 (UTC)