| Revision as of 18:27, 20 January 2013 editCollect (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers47,160 edits →Edit summaries: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:29, 20 January 2013 edit undoCollect (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers47,160 edits →3RR warning: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| Calling other editors "blind" is improper in edit summaries. ] (]) 18:27, 20 January 2013 (UTC) | Calling other editors "blind" is improper in edit summaries. ] (]) 18:27, 20 January 2013 (UTC) | ||
| == 3RR warning == | |||
| Please be advised you are now past 3RR at ] and that to avoid any possible admin actions you ought to self-revert your last edit. Cheers. ] (]) 18:29, 20 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:29, 20 January 2013
Criticism article
Hey, i don't know how much attention you were paying on Talk:Mail Online, but i've started up User:Jenova20/Criticism of the Daily Mail and Mail Online. It would be useful if you wanted to lend a hand there at all. Currently i just intent to grab some resources to see what i have and what the sources support. There's gonna be lots of work to go around if you're bored and want to chip in. Thanks ツ Jenova20 15:55, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
- Nice effort, I will join in future. Pscorp19 (talk) 13:59, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
DRN
There is a Dispute Resolution Noticeboard incident you may want to participate in concerning the Mail Online here. Thanks ツ Jenova20 15:32, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Edit summaries
Calling other editors "blind" is improper in edit summaries. Collect (talk) 18:27, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
3RR warning
Please be advised you are now past 3RR at Mail Online and that to avoid any possible admin actions you ought to self-revert your last edit. Cheers. Collect (talk) 18:29, 20 January 2013 (UTC)