Revision as of 18:56, 12 January 2013 editJohnpacklambert (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers602,719 edits →Indian women: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:19, 20 January 2013 edit undoElKevbo (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers125,789 edits WTF?Next edit → | ||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
] is a container category. It should not contain biographical articles.] (]) 18:56, 12 January 2013 (UTC) | ] is a container category. It should not contain biographical articles.] (]) 18:56, 12 January 2013 (UTC) | ||
==WTF?== | |||
Why are you being antagnostic with other editors, insulting them in Talk, accusing them of sockpuppetry, and labeling their edits vandalism when they're not? Cut out the personal attacks. If you believe others are using sockpuppets, bring it up ]. If you believe someone is repeatedly engaging in vandalism, report it ]. ] (]) 23:19, 20 January 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:19, 20 January 2013
Please feel free to leave "talk" here, but please do not revert or edit OTHER PEOPLE'S messages. In general, I clear out the old stuff every few months.
2013
File:Happy New Year 2013.jpg | Have an enjoyable New Year! | |
Hello Johnny Squeaky: Thanks for all of your contributions to Misplaced Pages, and have a happy and enjoyable New Year! Cheers, Northamerica1000 19:39, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
|
Indian women
Category:Indian women is a container category. It should not contain biographical articles.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:56, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
WTF?
Why are you being antagnostic with other editors, insulting them in Talk, accusing them of sockpuppetry, and labeling their edits vandalism when they're not? Cut out the personal attacks. If you believe others are using sockpuppets, bring it up here. If you believe someone is repeatedly engaging in vandalism, report it here. ElKevbo (talk) 23:19, 20 January 2013 (UTC)