Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 20:08, 24 January 2013

This user previously edited as Off2riorob.

Site ban enacted

It is unfortunate to advise you that as per this closure, consensus is that as per your own agreed-to restrictions, you are site-banned from the English Misplaced Pages at this time. Please see the details in the closing statement for your way forward. It is my sincere hope that when you return in the future (and I know that you will return someday) that you are able to work within not only Misplaced Pages's policies, but within the restrictions that you yourself set. (✉→BWilkins←✎) 13:02, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

What a very sad day this is..I will see you again in the future....Hell In A Bucket (talk) 13:18, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for all the hard work you've put into Misplaced Pages, particularly with regards to the Biographies of living persons noticeboard. Ritchie333 14:28, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

I don't agree with this, atall :( GoodDay (talk) 15:25, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Well, the bright side is that this isn't any sort of indictment of anything you said or did, and whoever thinks it is is deluding themselves. What this sort of thing comes down to is how many supporters you can line up vs. how many opponents they can line up. It's like World of Warcraft, sometimes there's just too many orcs and not enough humans. Tarc (talk) 16:23, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Tarc, if you believe that than you and CoM have more in common than you might think. Drmies (talk) 18:43, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

As do you and Will Beback, apparently. Tarc (talk) 18:56, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Tarc, as someone who supported (and supports) the site ban and who thinks it is a very sad day when an editor is blocked, I can safely say that my support is entirely due to what YRC said and did. I can also assure you that I am not deluding myself. No matter how good an editor someone is, if they are unable to edit in a collaborative environment without making personal attacks then Misplaced Pages does not benefit from their presence. Thryduulf (talk) 19:29, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Tarc: I'm insulted. I like Rob a lot; I think he's done good things. I also think he placed himself on a strict incivility probation (for good reason, I might add) and he failed to hold himself to his own standards. This is a shame and a pity, but it's also a fact. Between people claiming established editors get away with murder civility-wise, and people screaming when civility paroles are actually enforced, there is no ground on which to stand where someone is not furious with you. It was hard for everyone on that ANI thread to speak out; no one did so lightly. I know it was with real regret that I did so. I have hopes Rob will be back and he will be able to hold himself to those standards when he returns; I reject utterly the idea that this was some kind of kangaroo court. I'm sorry you are unhappy about the outcome; I disagree with you on what happened. Puppy has spoken, puppy is done. (Rob, apologies for continuing this on your userpage.) KillerChihuahua 20:02, 24 January 2013 (UTC)