Revision as of 22:19, 23 January 2013 editEdwardsBot (talk | contribs)354,693 edits →The Signpost: 21 January 2013: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:04, 25 January 2013 edit undoJc37 (talk | contribs)Administrators49,024 edits noteNext edit → | ||
Line 224: | Line 224: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<!-- EdwardsBot 0446 --> | <!-- EdwardsBot 0446 --> | ||
== Protecting a proposal == | |||
*] | |||
A proposal is not a policy page, nor an article. And indeed, it is considered disruptive to edit a proposal during an active straw poll (XFD is one example, see also some discussions concerning the recent Arbcom election as well.) | |||
So protection in this case was merely "preventative, not punitive". | |||
You're welcome to your opinion, but that in itself is all it is. | |||
Incidentally, no worries, I'll just see about placing any future proposals in user space so that such nonsense will be avoided in the future. Shrugs. | |||
Happy editing. - <b>]</b> 21:04, 25 January 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:04, 25 January 2013
Talkback
Hello, Snowolf. You have new messages at Ubikwit's talk page.You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Re: Vandalism Warning Toolbox
Hello, Snowolf. You have new messages at Kbh3rd's talk page.You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the opportunity to make substantial valuable contributions to an article using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High . The score is calculated by combining an article's readership and quality.
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Misplaced Pages better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 02:23, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXXXII, January 2013
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:55, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 21 January 2013
- News and notes: Requests for adminship reform moves forward
- WikiProject report: Say What? — WikiProject Linguistics
- Featured content: Wazzup, G? Delegates and featured topics in review
- Arbitration report: Doncram case continues
- Technology report: Data centre switchover a tentative success
Protecting a proposal
A proposal is not a policy page, nor an article. And indeed, it is considered disruptive to edit a proposal during an active straw poll (XFD is one example, see also some discussions concerning the recent Arbcom election as well.)
So protection in this case was merely "preventative, not punitive".
You're welcome to your opinion, but that in itself is all it is.
Incidentally, no worries, I'll just see about placing any future proposals in user space so that such nonsense will be avoided in the future. Shrugs.
Happy editing. - jc37 21:04, 25 January 2013 (UTC)