| Revision as of 10:46, 23 February 2013 editDPL bot (talk | contribs)Bots670,351 edits dablink notification message (see the FAQ)← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:02, 24 February 2013 edit undoBlaxthos (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers16,596 edits →User RFC: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 406: | Line 406: | ||
| It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 10:46, 23 February 2013 (UTC) | It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 10:46, 23 February 2013 (UTC) | ||
| == User RFC == | |||
| Hello! Thank you for your recent inquiry about another editor, with whom I've had a long history over the years. It sounds like not much has changed, and you're running into the same behaviors that I experienced when I was more active. While I completely share your frustration, I no longer have the time to dedicate to Misplaced Pages as I once did. Also, I have concerns with the efficacy and methodology of the way Misplaced Pages deals with these sorts of issues -- essentially, I'm not sure I have faith that the community can effectively deal with his sort of behavior at all. So, all that bundled together means I'm pretty much over it... So, you're welcome to reference my past dealings if you proceed, and it's likely I will eventually weigh in if the community takes the RFC seriously, but I would prefer not to be a co-sponsor or whatever. Best of luck! //] <small>( ] / ] )</small> 00:02, 24 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:02, 24 February 2013
 Archives |
Please comment on Misplaced Pages talk:Notability (people)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Misplaced Pages talk:Notability (people). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Misplaced Pages:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 18:15, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low 
to High 
.
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Misplaced Pages better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:25, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
Rape and pregnancy controversies in United States elections, 2012
Hi Casprings, I'm beginning the copy-edit you requested for the above article at the GOCE Request page. Please feel free to contact me, or to correct or revert my changes if I'm doing something I shouldn't. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 21:12, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
- Done - I don't think there's anything else I can do there at the moment. I see the article's a GA candidate, so i wish you good luck with it. :-) My only suggestions might be to add an infobox and navbox, and to convert the references into a single format, preferably 'cite' format - though the latter isn't a GA requirement. I moved a lot of text onto the talk page for various reasons, listed there. I hope it's been useful; feel free to contact me about any issues arising from the copy-edit. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 05:29, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi Casprings, I'm currently reviewing the article you nominated for good status (Rape and pregnancy controversies in United States elections, 2012) . Thank you for the nomination, I will let you know the conclusion of the review when it's completed. TotallyNotEtreo 18:40, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
- Etreo again. The article that you nominated passed the review, and is now a good article. I know you were interested in it one day reaching Featured standard, and my only recommendation would be that some more of the Republican perspective. Though admittedly it might be better to get the advice of a more experienced reviewer for Featured content than me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TotallyNotEtreo (talk • contribs) 20:57, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
GOCE Copy Edit Request - Sandra Fluke
Hi Casprings - I just wanted to send you a quick message to inform you that your requested copy edit of the article Sandra Fluke is complete. Best of luck the continued improvements to this article! If you have any questions or concerns, feel free to leave a message on my talk page. Cheers, Freebirdthemonk 05:44, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rape and pregnancy controversies in United States elections, 2012, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tom Smith (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
Removal of Tags
Do not remove tags until the discusion is resolved. Arzel (talk) 22:40, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
Concensus cannot overide WP policies. You do not seem to understand this in the least. Arzel (talk) 14:49, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
- It has not been resolved. Your removal of the tags is improper. Furthermore, discussion on the talk page is now split. Please do not remove the tag again until there is resolution, especially with false edit statements like you did. Arzel (talk) 19:11, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
Closing DRN case
Thanks for trying to close it yourself after you noticed that. I think it probably would have taken it off the list the next time it was updated (it's updated by a bot every half hour), but closing and archiving is the right way to do it - I've closed it for you, and it will be archived and removed from the list in 24 hours. CarrieVS (talk) 11:28, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Misplaced Pages better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 03:10, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rape and pregnancy controversies in United States elections, 2012, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
User RFC
Hello! Thank you for your recent inquiry about another editor, with whom I've had a long history over the years. It sounds like not much has changed, and you're running into the same behaviors that I experienced when I was more active. While I completely share your frustration, I no longer have the time to dedicate to Misplaced Pages as I once did. Also, I have concerns with the efficacy and methodology of the way Misplaced Pages deals with these sorts of issues -- essentially, I'm not sure I have faith that the community can effectively deal with his sort of behavior at all. So, all that bundled together means I'm pretty much over it... So, you're welcome to reference my past dealings if you proceed, and it's likely I will eventually weigh in if the community takes the RFC seriously, but I would prefer not to be a co-sponsor or whatever. Best of luck! //Blaxthos ( t / c ) 00:02, 24 February 2013 (UTC)