Misplaced Pages

User talk:70.190.0.52: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:48, 5 March 2013 editMesaBoy77 (talk | contribs)109 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 17:08, 5 March 2013 edit undoMesaBoy77 (talk | contribs)109 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
Mr. Ollie. I have removed the reference to Sestus. Please cease removing the information regarding virtual token MFA. Mr. Ollie. I have removed the reference to Sestus. Please cease removing the information regarding virtual token MFA.

== March 2013 ==
] Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 15:40, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
:''If this is a ], and you did not make the edit, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice -->


== ] reported by ] (Result: ) == == ] reported by ] (Result: ) ==

Revision as of 17:08, 5 March 2013

Mr. Ollie. I have removed the reference to Sestus. Please cease removing the information regarding virtual token MFA.

User:MrOllie reported by User:MesaBoy77 (Result: )

Page: Security token (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: MrOllie (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Mr. Ollie is engaged in a "promotion-by-censorship" campaign on Misplaced Pages. Mr. Ollie is repeatedly editing Misplaced Pages articles to remove pertinent page content, while specifically ignoring product content he wishes to promote.

By way of example, he has repeatedly attempted to edit several pages related to Security token (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) and also Multifactor authentication (under the guise of objecting to alleged spammer content). The information he is attempting to remove, however, does not reference any specific company or product, but simply describes another form of token authentication (in this page, virtual token MFA). Mr. Ollie conspicuously does not remove specific company named products from the pages (i.e. RSA SecurID token, Safenet's eToken, and Vasco), suggesting he is engaging in a "promotion-by-censorship" campaign, deliberately removing information related to other forms of authentication in order to promote specific named products and companies on that page.

I am the original author of most of the named page content (see history going back to 2009). In an attempt to satisfy Mr. Ollie's earlier edits, I specifically removed all vendor names related to the virtual token form of multifactor authentication, leaving only technical information related to authentication method. Yet, Mr. Ollie continued to removed the entire section, effectually censoring pertinent MFA information from the MFA page in order to promote product content by RSA, Safenet, and Vasco.

Mr Ollie's user talk page contains numerous complaints by Misplaced Pages content submitters regarding similar "promotion-by-censorship" behavior. In accordance with this page's guidelines, I have placed a notice on Mr. Ollie's user talk page. - MesaBoy77 (talk) 15:55, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

User talk:70.190.0.52: Difference between revisions Add topic