| Revision as of 01:58, 12 March 2013 editVolunteer Marek (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers94,116 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:46, 21 March 2013 edit undoNihil novi (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users56,588 edits copy-editNext edit → | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| ]'s death]] | ]'s death]] | ||
| The '''Gąsawa massacre''' ({{lang-pl|Zbrodnia gąsawska}}, literally "the |
The '''Gąsawa massacre''' ({{lang-pl|Zbrodnia gąsawska}}, literally "the Gąsawa crime") was a 1227 attack on a meeting of Polish ] dukes which was being held near the village of ] in ], ]. The ], ], was assassinated, and Duke ] of ] was gravely wounded.<ref name="Jas"/> Because several of the victims were retiring for the night and bathing at the time of the attack, the event is sometimes known in Polish historiography as the '''Gąsawa Bloodbath''' (''krwawa łaźnia w Gąsawie'').<ref name="Hist">{{cite web | url=http://www.wykop.pl/ramka/1330571/zjazd-gasawski-czyli-rozpad-piastowskiej-jednosci/ | title=Zjazd w Gąsawie czyli rozpad piastowskiej jedności? | publisher=HistMag.org | date=Nov 2012, 24 | accessdate=March 11, 2013 | author=Sałański, Marcin}}</ref> | ||
| ==History== | |||
| While |
While direct responsibility for the attack is generally ascribed by historians to ],<ref name="Bart">{{cite book | title=Negotiations of Power in a Medieval Society: Ecclesiastical Authority and Secular Rulership in Little Poland, 1177--1320 | publisher=ProQuest | author=Bartos, Sebastian | year=2008 | pages=66}}</ref> many circumstances surrounding the crime remained unexplained and controversial. Świętopełk's aim was to make the ], which his ] held as regents of the Polish rulers, independent of Piast overlordship. The murder of Leszek the White, Świętopełk's suzerain, thus served his interests. However, several historians have pointed to Duke ],<ref name="Jas">{{cite book | title=Polska Piastow | publisher=Proszynski | author=Jasienica Pawel | authorlink=Pawel Jasienica | year=2007 | pages=174, 236 | isbn=9788374694797}}</ref> who had forged an alliance with Świętopełk shortly before the attack, as the main instigator.<ref name="Glad">{{cite book | title=The Forgotten Crusaders: Poland and the Crusader Movement in the Twelfth and Thirteenth Centuries | publisher=Brill | author=Gladysz, Mikolaj | year=2012 | pages=209 | isbn=9789004185517}}</ref> Odonic's actual target would have been his uncle, Duke ], with whom Odonic had been involved in a long-running conflict over control of ] (''Wielkopolska''). Under this hypothesis, Odonic <!-- who may or may have not been present personally at the meeting - sources are conflicted on this--> provided information necessary for a successful attack to Świętopełk's men, who actually did the deed. Other historians have disputed this thesis, pointing out that Spindleshank was not harmed in the attack, that Odonic did not profit from the death of Leszek (with whom he had had generally amicable relations), and that there is no record that contemporaries or the families of the slain held Odonic responsible. Rather, in this view, the blame was ascribed retroactively to Odonic several decades later, during fighting between Dukes of Silesia who were descendants of Henry, and those of Greater Poland, who were related to Odonic. A particularly puzzling fact is the absence of condemnation by ecclesiastical authorities (some of whom were present at the meeting), who tended to react strongly to regicides and at that time took an active role in Polish political affairs.<ref name="Labuda">{{cite journal | title=Śmierć Leszka Białego (1227) | author=Labuda, Gerard | authorlink=Gerard Labuda| journal=Roczniki Historyczne | year=1995 | volume=61 | pages=7-33}} Gerard Labuda describing the views of Józef Uminski.</ref> | ||
| Whatever the exact circumstances of, or the responsibility for, the event, it is generally accepted that the crime contributed to the deepening of the ]. Świętopełk successfully cast off the control of Piast dukes over Gdańsk Pomerania and began using the title ''dux'' (rather than regent).<ref name="Glad"/> Piast control over |
Whatever the exact circumstances of, or the responsibility for, the event, it is generally accepted that the crime contributed to the deepening of the ]. Świętopełk successfully cast off the control of the Piast dukes over Gdańsk Pomerania and began using the title ''dux'' (rather than "regent").<ref name="Glad"/> Piast control over the area was not re-established until the ] (1282) between ] and ] (perhaps ironically, a grandson of Odonic).<ref name="Jas"/> The death of Leszek the White undermined the authority and status of the "High Duke of Poland" (''principat''), who technically ruled over all the other regional Polish dukes, with the "seniorate" province of ]/] essentially becoming just another feudal area to be fought over. Poland, as a unified political entity, was not re-established until the rule of ] or ] at the turn of the 13th and 14th centuries.<ref name="Jas"/><ref name="Hist"/> | ||
| ==References== | ==References== | ||
Revision as of 20:46, 21 March 2013
The Gąsawa massacre (Template:Lang-pl, literally "the Gąsawa crime") was a 1227 attack on a meeting of Polish Piast dukes which was being held near the village of Gąsawa in Kujawy, Poland. The High Duke of Poland, Leszek the White, was assassinated, and Duke Henry the Bearded of Silesia was gravely wounded. Because several of the victims were retiring for the night and bathing at the time of the attack, the event is sometimes known in Polish historiography as the Gąsawa Bloodbath (krwawa łaźnia w Gąsawie).
History
While direct responsibility for the attack is generally ascribed by historians to Świętopełk of Pomerania, many circumstances surrounding the crime remained unexplained and controversial. Świętopełk's aim was to make the Duchy of Gdańsk Pomerania, which his House of Sobiesław held as regents of the Polish rulers, independent of Piast overlordship. The murder of Leszek the White, Świętopełk's suzerain, thus served his interests. However, several historians have pointed to Duke Władysław Odonic, who had forged an alliance with Świętopełk shortly before the attack, as the main instigator. Odonic's actual target would have been his uncle, Duke Władysław Spindleshanks, with whom Odonic had been involved in a long-running conflict over control of Greater Poland (Wielkopolska). Under this hypothesis, Odonic provided information necessary for a successful attack to Świętopełk's men, who actually did the deed. Other historians have disputed this thesis, pointing out that Spindleshank was not harmed in the attack, that Odonic did not profit from the death of Leszek (with whom he had had generally amicable relations), and that there is no record that contemporaries or the families of the slain held Odonic responsible. Rather, in this view, the blame was ascribed retroactively to Odonic several decades later, during fighting between Dukes of Silesia who were descendants of Henry, and those of Greater Poland, who were related to Odonic. A particularly puzzling fact is the absence of condemnation by ecclesiastical authorities (some of whom were present at the meeting), who tended to react strongly to regicides and at that time took an active role in Polish political affairs.
Whatever the exact circumstances of, or the responsibility for, the event, it is generally accepted that the crime contributed to the deepening of the feudal fragmentation of Poland. Świętopełk successfully cast off the control of the Piast dukes over Gdańsk Pomerania and began using the title dux (rather than "regent"). Piast control over the area was not re-established until the Treaty of Kępno (1282) between Mściwój II of Pomerania and Przemysł II (perhaps ironically, a grandson of Odonic). The death of Leszek the White undermined the authority and status of the "High Duke of Poland" (principat), who technically ruled over all the other regional Polish dukes, with the "seniorate" province of Kraków/Małopolska essentially becoming just another feudal area to be fought over. Poland, as a unified political entity, was not re-established until the rule of Wenceslaus III or Władysław the Elbow-high at the turn of the 13th and 14th centuries.
References
- ^ Jasienica Pawel (2007). Polska Piastow. Proszynski. pp. 174, 236. ISBN 9788374694797.
- ^ Sałański, Marcin (Nov 2012, 24). "Zjazd w Gąsawie czyli rozpad piastowskiej jedności?". HistMag.org. Retrieved March 11, 2013.
{{cite web}}: Check date values in:|date=(help) - Bartos, Sebastian (2008). Negotiations of Power in a Medieval Society: Ecclesiastical Authority and Secular Rulership in Little Poland, 1177--1320. ProQuest. p. 66.
- ^ Gladysz, Mikolaj (2012). The Forgotten Crusaders: Poland and the Crusader Movement in the Twelfth and Thirteenth Centuries. Brill. p. 209. ISBN 9789004185517.
- Labuda, Gerard (1995). "Śmierć Leszka Białego (1227)". Roczniki Historyczne. 61: 7–33. Gerard Labuda describing the views of Józef Uminski.