| Revision as of 12:19, 26 March 2013 editSecond Quantization (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers24,876 editsm Reverted 1 edit by 84.106.26.81 (talk) to last revision by IRWolfie-. (TW)← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:41, 26 March 2013 edit undoKeithbob (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers47,111 edits welcome and friendly cautionNext edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| {{Wikibreak}} | {{Wikibreak}} | ||
| ==The TM topic== | |||
| Hi IRWolfie and welcome to the TM topic area. I’ve noticed that you have removed significant amounts of sourced content without discussion or consensus. Being new to the topic are you may have been unaware of the TM ArbCom and that the articles in the topic fall under its discretionary sanctions including In light of this you might consider self-reverting these edits and discussing them on the talk page before removing them again. | |||
| *In you removed text along with 7 sources. | |||
| *In you removed text and 3 sources. | |||
| *In you removed a large amount of content along with 4 sources. | |||
| Thanks for your input and good faith efforts to improve the articles in and around the TM topic. Best,--<span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS,sans -serif"> — ] • ] • </span> 17:41, 26 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:41, 26 March 2013
Archive 1,2,3,4, 5 /Suggestion Box
 | Second Quantization is taking a short wikibreak and will be back on Misplaced Pages soon. |
The TM topic
Hi IRWolfie and welcome to the TM topic area. I’ve noticed that you have removed significant amounts of sourced content without discussion or consensus. Being new to the topic are you may have been unaware of the TM ArbCom and that the articles in the topic fall under its discretionary sanctions including Peremptory reversion or removal of material referenced to reliable sources and added in good faith by others, is considered disruptive when done to excess. This is particularly true of controversial topics where it may be perceived as confrontational. In light of this you might consider self-reverting these edits and discussing them on the talk page before removing them again.
- In this edit you removed text along with 7 sources.
- In this edit you removed text and 3 sources.
- In this edit you removed a large amount of content along with 4 sources.
Thanks for your input and good faith efforts to improve the articles in and around the TM topic. Best,-- — Keithbob • Talk • 17:41, 26 March 2013 (UTC)