Revision as of 10:39, 21 March 2013 editSeal Boxer (talk | contribs)122 edits →Scotpina and CheckUser: no worries← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:59, 29 March 2013 edit undoBDD (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators111,940 edits →A cup of tea for you!: new WikiLove messageNext edit → | ||
Line 130: | Line 130: | ||
] (]) 10:39, 21 March 2013 (UTC) | ] (]) 10:39, 21 March 2013 (UTC) | ||
== A cup of tea for you! == | |||
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | ] is looking alright. I also regret what I've said about you, and I look forward to working with you in the future. ] (]) 20:59, 29 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
|} |
Revision as of 20:59, 29 March 2013
test
Speedy deletion nomination of Box of Seals
Hello Anthony Seldon,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Box of Seals for deletion, because it doesn't seem to have any encyclopedic content.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Gbawden (talk) 13:57, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello, thank you, it is a Work in Progress. Anthony Seldon (talk) 13:58, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- Any work in progress should be developed in your sandbox, or as a sub-page in your user space. I have moved the article to User:Anthony Seldon/Box of seals for you to work on at your leisure without worrying about some oaf coming along and deleting it. ~Amatulić (talk) 14:17, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Atmospheric Administration listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Atmospheric Administration. Since you had some involvement with the Atmospheric Administration redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Andy Dingley (talk) 15:14, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
National Oceanic listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect National Oceanic. Since you had some involvement with the National Oceanic redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Andy Dingley (talk) 15:14, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Seal Transportation
The article Seal Transportation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Not a good faith article creation - see editor history
While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:15, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
I have objected, and, I do not have a dubious history as you claim. Anthony Seldon (talk) 15:23, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- No, your history is perfectly clean – because you wipe the vandalism warnings from it (as you're entirely entitled to do). However don't pretend to other editors that you're blameless. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:26, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- Are you talking about me as a person? I do not like this sort of slur! Anthony Seldon (talk) 15:29, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Seal Transportation for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Seal Transportation is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Seal Transportation until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:25, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Anthony Seldon, you are invited to the Teahouse
Hi Anthony Seldon! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages. |
Proposed deletion of Goat Transportation
The article Goat Transportation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WikiDan61ReadMe!! 14:49, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Goat Transportation for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Goat Transportation is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Goat Transportation until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. It's a Fox! (What did I break) 15:22, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Goat Transportation
Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Misplaced Pages, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Goat Transportation, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Misplaced Pages's criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Andy Dingley (talk) 21:41, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
Please note
...that Misplaced Pages is not for things you made up one day (i.e. ) and Misplaced Pages content must be verifiable as being notable through reliable sources. Thank you. - The Bushranger One ping only 22:32, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
MfD nomination of User:Anthony Seldon/Box of seals
User:Anthony Seldon/Box of seals, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/User:Anthony Seldon/Box of seals and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Anthony Seldon/Box of seals during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:43, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Retaliatory edits
Hi,
I appreciate that it's unpleasant for your work to be nominated for deletion. However, it is never a good idea to take this personally. In particular, I've closed the retaliatory AfD you raised at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Warm glass and deleted User:Anthony Seldon/AD diffs, an attack page devoted to the editor who nominated your article for deletion. I've left a comment to the effect that User:Anthony Seldon/Box of seals is a valid work page on its own deletion discussion and advised the nominating editor to step back.
Please let me know if you have any questions regarding these actions or other areas of Misplaced Pages process. Thanks. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 15:40, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Username
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. I noticed that your username, "Anthony Seldon", may not meet Misplaced Pages's username policy because the username and user page information match with a notable person. If you are Anthony Seldon, please verify your identity with Misplaced Pages; instructions are at Misplaced Pages:Username policy#Real names. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. Peter James (talk) 22:55, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you for your remarks, I was unaware of this policy. I shall react accordingly. Anthony Seldon (talk) 10:32, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
Talkback
Hello, Seal Boxer. You have new messages at Talk:Sealskin.You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
WikiDan61ReadMe!! 12:23, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Tobacco pouch
The article Tobacco pouch has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Dictionary definition, and a trivial one at that.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WikiDan61ReadMe!! 14:07, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
Scotpina and CheckUser
As you might already have seen, Scotpina has been exposed as a sock/meat/random coincidence of Shanker Pur, and unrelated to your account.
In which case, mea culpa I apologise sincerely for implying that you might have been the sockmaster behind these three accounts.
Things haven't got off to a great start so far, but I note your tobacco pouch article with interest – I was actually about to remove the prod on it, but you beat me to it. This looks like a good topic for an article and I wish you luck with it. The idea of forged tobacco pouches as an aid to tobacco smuggling was particularly interesting. I hope that we can have more productive editing interactions in the future. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:06, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, it's interesting how some mundane items have an encyclopedic value. The tobacco pouch article reminded me of the wine list article I wrote some years back.
- I added a picture. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:56, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
- Dear Andy,
Thank you for letting me know. I agree we did get off to a bad start, but let us put that in the past - and I also look forward to a positive editing future on this encyclopedia. I am glad you like the tobacco pouch article - and thank you User:Amatulic for adding the image.
Seal Boxer (talk) 10:39, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
A cup of tea for you!
Tobacco pouch is looking alright. I also regret what I've said about you, and I look forward to working with you in the future. BDD (talk) 20:59, 29 March 2013 (UTC) |