| Revision as of 23:27, 1 April 2013 editVolunteer Marek (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers94,133 edits →Talkback: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:09, 2 April 2013 edit undoSjones23 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers102,368 edits →A barnstar for you!: new WikiLove messageNext edit → | ||
| Line 67: | Line 67: | ||
| And seriously, that stuff needs to be removed. It's completely bad faithed (user's personal screeds being presented as some kind of "official" findings, rantings by anonymous trolls six years ago etc.) and it's very size and presentation mode makes it disruptive. If Skapperod wants to take his sweet time in fixing his post, well, I don't see why that's a valid excuse in a case like this. If he can't be bothered to properly link rather than spam, then his post should simply be redacted.<span style="color:Blue">]</span><span style="color:Orange">]</span> 23:27, 1 April 2013 (UTC) | And seriously, that stuff needs to be removed. It's completely bad faithed (user's personal screeds being presented as some kind of "official" findings, rantings by anonymous trolls six years ago etc.) and it's very size and presentation mode makes it disruptive. If Skapperod wants to take his sweet time in fixing his post, well, I don't see why that's a valid excuse in a case like this. If he can't be bothered to properly link rather than spam, then his post should simply be redacted.<span style="color:Blue">]</span><span style="color:Orange">]</span> 23:27, 1 April 2013 (UTC) | ||
| == A barnstar for you! == | |||
| {| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
| |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Admin's Barnstar''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Hi, GWH. I want to give you this admin's barnstar for your excellent work as an administrator and for your fine contributions on Misplaced Pages. Keep up the good work! Warmest regards, ] (] - ]) 21:09, 2 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
Revision as of 21:09, 2 April 2013
Hi, I'm George. Feel free to leave me a new message!
The Signpost: 18 March 2013
- News and notes: Resigning arbitrator slams Committee
- WikiProject report: Making music
- Featured content: Misplaced Pages stays warm
- Arbitration report: Richard case closes
- Technology report: Visual Editor "on schedule"
The Bugle: Issue LXXXIV, March 2013
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 03:44, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 25 March 2013
- WikiProject report: The 'Burgh: WikiProject Pittsburgh
- Featured content: One and a half soursops
- Arbitration report: Two open cases
- News and notes: Sue Gardner to leave WMF; German Wikipedians spearhead another effort to close Wikinews
- Technology report: The Visual Editor: Where are we now, and where are we headed?
- Recent research: "Ignore all rules" in deletions; anonymity and groupthink; how readers react when shown talk pages
Naval History
Hello, 'Georgewilliamherbert', I'm a member of WikiProject Ships. To help naval historians here at Misplaced Pages in the effort of writing and citing naval history articles sometime ago I created the List of ships captured in the 19th century and Bibliography of early American naval history pages. Over the last year(+) I have been tracking down and including names of captured ships and naval history texts for inclusion in either of these articles. I like to think that I have included most captured ships (19th century) and most naval history texts (1700s-1800s) for inclusion in these articles, so if you know of any captured ships or naval history texts that are not included would you kindly include them, either on the page or the talk page of the appropriate article? Any help would be a big help and feedback is always welcomed. Thanx! -- Gwillhickers (talk) 17:12, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
Talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
And seriously, that stuff needs to be removed. It's completely bad faithed (user's personal screeds being presented as some kind of "official" findings, rantings by anonymous trolls six years ago etc.) and it's very size and presentation mode makes it disruptive. If Skapperod wants to take his sweet time in fixing his post, well, I don't see why that's a valid excuse in a case like this. If he can't be bothered to properly link rather than spam, then his post should simply be redacted.Volunteer Marek 23:27, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Admin's Barnstar |
| Hi, GWH. I want to give you this admin's barnstar for your excellent work as an administrator and for your fine contributions on Misplaced Pages. Keep up the good work! Warmest regards, Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 21:09, 2 April 2013 (UTC) |