| Revision as of 00:39, 1 January 2003 editMrwojo (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers15,712 edits New articles should at least have a definition← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:48, 1 January 2003 edit undoTakuyaMurata (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers89,986 editsmNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| :All articles, even new stubs, should answer basic questions such as "What is it? Why is it important? When did it happen?" in a couple sentences. Articles that lack even a definition look suspicious. --] | :All articles, even new stubs, should answer basic questions such as "What is it? Why is it important? When did it happen?" in a couple sentences. Articles that lack even a definition look suspicious. --] | ||
| I will try again. Then if you find it inadequate then rewrite/move/delete it. Thanks --TakuyaMurata | |||
Revision as of 00:48, 1 January 2003
Moved the following here: The Wiki Way Quick collaboration on the Web, Addison-Wesley (April, 2001) ISBN: 020171499X by Bo Leuf, Ward Cunningham
See also the homepage of the book.
Misplaced Pages is not a collection of links. -- Zoe
So what should we put? At least ISBN code and the name of the publisher is imporant to find the book. --User:TakuyaMurata
- All articles, even new stubs, should answer basic questions such as "What is it? Why is it important? When did it happen?" in a couple sentences. Articles that lack even a definition look suspicious. --Mrwojo
I will try again. Then if you find it inadequate then rewrite/move/delete it. Thanks --TakuyaMurata