| Revision as of 03:13, 3 April 2013 editShokatz (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,194 edits Removed, there has been no violation of 3RR.← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:34, 14 April 2013 edit undoПравичност (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,628 edits →Maps manipulation: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
| I'm really not sure what the confusion is here. Have you read the source that you claim to be "syncing" with? It clearly contradicts what you are arguing: "Article 3. of the Accession Treaty states that Member States shall deposit instruments of ratification with the | I'm really not sure what the confusion is here. Have you read the source that you claim to be "syncing" with? It clearly contradicts what you are arguing: "Article 3. of the Accession Treaty states that Member States shall deposit instruments of ratification with the | ||
| Government of the Italian Republic, therefore, '''only upon fulfillment of that conditions the Accession Treaty can be considered officially ratified''' in individual Member State." It lists these states as "parliamentary approval obtained" and NOT "ratification procedure completed." Listing them as "Ratification process completed", as you're attempting to do, is both inaccurate and contradicts the sources. I've reverted your proposed changes several times, and restored the long-term ] version per ]. Please self-revert and discuss on the talk page if you disagree with me and all the the sources. ] (]) 21:10, 2 April 2013 (UTC) | Government of the Italian Republic, therefore, '''only upon fulfillment of that conditions the Accession Treaty can be considered officially ratified''' in individual Member State." It lists these states as "parliamentary approval obtained" and NOT "ratification procedure completed." Listing them as "Ratification process completed", as you're attempting to do, is both inaccurate and contradicts the sources. I've reverted your proposed changes several times, and restored the long-term ] version per ]. Please self-revert and discuss on the talk page if you disagree with me and all the the sources. ] (]) 21:10, 2 April 2013 (UTC) | ||
| == Maps manipulation == | |||
| The map you are trying to show on Herzeg-Bosnia article has nothing to do with herzeg bosnia. It shows military achievements of both Croatian and Muslim forces (with the help of NATO) ... just before the Dayton agreement in 1995. Not 1994! What is shown on that map was after operation storm, after which Muslim and Croatian forces which decided to fight together against Rep. Srpska then came closer to Banja Luka with the help of NATo bombardment and after that Dayton peace was agreed. Get a map from croatian source wikipedia, dont manipulate with maps to show falsa data and false history. (] (]) 19:34, 14 April 2013 (UTC)) | |||
Revision as of 19:34, 14 April 2013
Welcome!
Welcome to Misplaced Pages, Shokatz! Thank you for your contributions. I am Marek69 and have been editing Misplaced Pages for quite some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Misplaced Pages:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!
Marek.69 00:30, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
Re: Is it just me or?
I don't believe Amir071 is the same as 67.248.128.225; the pattern is similar, but not identical. The others are sockpuppets of the IP address; for one, it's clear, and I've blocked it; the other one is highly suspicious, but I'm not blocking it after a single contentious edit. --Joy (talk) 07:38, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
Re: IP Vandal
Sokac121 and IvanOS think it's User:Oldhouse2012, actually, not User:Nado158. In any case, you should find diffs that demonstrate an exact pattern and report whoever it is at WP:SPI. They seem to have demonstrated a pattern of victimization at this point so it would be best that a completely uninvolved admin intervenes. --Joy (talk) 19:14, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
- G'day, reported as sock of Oldhouse2012 here Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Oldhouse2012. Regards, Peacemaker67 (send... over) 05:54, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
IvanOS
Too late — someone reverted you. I blocked Ivan and mass-reverted him because he was deleting text from articles without explanation, which is never a good thing. Thanks for asking for my opinion, but since I have no opinion on whether this text belongs in the article, I won't be able to offer useful input, aside from saying that you need not worry about my concerns on this specific article. Nyttend (talk) 18:39, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
Accession of Croatia to the European Union
I'm really not sure what the confusion is here. Have you read the source that you claim to be "syncing" with? It clearly contradicts what you are arguing: "Article 3. of the Accession Treaty states that Member States shall deposit instruments of ratification with the Government of the Italian Republic, therefore, only upon fulfillment of that conditions the Accession Treaty can be considered officially ratified in individual Member State." It lists these states as "parliamentary approval obtained" and NOT "ratification procedure completed." Listing them as "Ratification process completed", as you're attempting to do, is both inaccurate and contradicts the sources. I've reverted your proposed changes several times, and restored the long-term WP:CONSENSUS version per WP:BRD. Please self-revert and discuss on the talk page if you disagree with me and all the the sources. TDL (talk) 21:10, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
Maps manipulation
The map you are trying to show on Herzeg-Bosnia article has nothing to do with herzeg bosnia. It shows military achievements of both Croatian and Muslim forces (with the help of NATO) ... just before the Dayton agreement in 1995. Not 1994! What is shown on that map was after operation storm, after which Muslim and Croatian forces which decided to fight together against Rep. Srpska then came closer to Banja Luka with the help of NATo bombardment and after that Dayton peace was agreed. Get a map from croatian source wikipedia, dont manipulate with maps to show falsa data and false history. (Правичност (talk) 19:34, 14 April 2013 (UTC))