Misplaced Pages

Talk:Feminism/to do: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Talk:Feminism Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:35, 21 April 2013 editCailil (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users15,119 editsm clean-up← Previous edit Revision as of 00:43, 21 April 2013 edit undoCailil (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users15,119 edits -1: Patriarchy is mentioned in the first section (after the lede) teh subsection on Patriarchy can be moved up if needs beNext edit →
Line 3: Line 3:
#33 citation needs page numbers #33 citation needs page numbers
#Section on "Mid-twentieth century" needs work: a) the first paragraph needs to bring together the de Beauvoir material and the second-wave material better; b) it should mention "difference feminism" somehow - it needs to convey that the assumptions underlying second-wave feminism were different than those underlying first-wave feminism. #Section on "Mid-twentieth century" needs work: a) the first paragraph needs to bring together the de Beauvoir material and the second-wave material better; b) it should mention "difference feminism" somehow - it needs to convey that the assumptions underlying second-wave feminism were different than those underlying first-wave feminism.
#Introduce the concept of patriarchy earlier in the article. It is so central to understanding nearly every form of feminism.
#The "Pornography" section is a bit unclear. Could you spell out in a few sentences what exactly the debate was/is? The "Prostitution" section does that very well. #The "Pornography" section is a bit unclear. Could you spell out in a few sentences what exactly the debate was/is? The "Prostitution" section does that very well.
#The "Socialism" subsection does not explain the general impact as well the other two sub-sections. It is too fact-based. #The "Socialism" subsection does not explain the general impact as well the other two sub-sections. It is too fact-based.

Revision as of 00:43, 21 April 2013

  1. Improve article to featured standards
  2. Harmonize citation style (using {{cite}}) and making sure all relevant page numbers are included.
  3. 33 citation needs page numbers
  4. Section on "Mid-twentieth century" needs work: a) the first paragraph needs to bring together the de Beauvoir material and the second-wave material better; b) it should mention "difference feminism" somehow - it needs to convey that the assumptions underlying second-wave feminism were different than those underlying first-wave feminism.
  5. The "Pornography" section is a bit unclear. Could you spell out in a few sentences what exactly the debate was/is? The "Prostitution" section does that very well.
  6. The "Socialism" subsection does not explain the general impact as well the other two sub-sections. It is too fact-based.