| Revision as of 16:25, 27 May 2006 editJh.daniell (talk | contribs)345 editsNo edit summary | Revision as of 20:29, 27 May 2006 edit undoNishidani (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users99,546 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| I know this may seem rude, but I think you should make a personal page containing your introduction as it seems a certain editor named ] considers your account a ] created by me to bolster my argument with him on the ] article's discussion page.--] 01:24, 28 May 2006 (GMT+9:00-Tokyo) | I know this may seem rude, but I think you should make a personal page containing your introduction as it seems a certain editor named ] considers your account a ] created by me to bolster my argument with him on the ] article's discussion page.--] 01:24, 28 May 2006 (GMT+9:00-Tokyo) | ||
| I don't think a personal page would help. On the net, we are all virtual, and personal pages can be as fictional as say, much of Hermeneus's thinking about his knowledge of the nihonjinron. Let me say that were I you, I certainly would not write 'Nihonshoki', the title of one of the two primary classics of early Japanese mythohistory, for 'Nihonjinron' as you did in your last post. I should add that I think Hermeneus had a point, only it got lost in his attitude, which certainly lacks, in its hypersensitiveness to his sense of endangered status, any delicacy of feeling. My argument was with his attitude, which might be tolerable were he erudite, since his knowledge would balance out his character defects. I detect in his manipulation of contributions to this site a political strategy to tone down to what he construes as Japanese national advantage and dignity, by throwing up pseudo-distinctions, as though there were established academic distinctions, between 'stereotype' and 'theory' (ron). All stereotypes, as Lord Keynes would have reminded Hermeneus had he ever read him, are born of theories. Most cultural theories of the kind we witness in the nihonjinron degenerate into clichés. In some sense the cliché reflects back on the theory. But Hermeneus can't grasp this. If, in warning you, I upset you by creating a misleading impression, I apologize. But the game underway has been played many times in here, and the eventual outcome was forseeable. I hope I saved you your time and probable wasted efforts, at least ] 20:29, 27 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:29, 27 May 2006
Nishidani,
I know this may seem rude, but I think you should make a personal page containing your introduction as it seems a certain editor named Hermeneus considers your account a sock puppet created by me to bolster my argument with him on the Nihonjinron article's discussion page.--Jh.daniell 01:24, 28 May 2006 (GMT+9:00-Tokyo)
I don't think a personal page would help. On the net, we are all virtual, and personal pages can be as fictional as say, much of Hermeneus's thinking about his knowledge of the nihonjinron. Let me say that were I you, I certainly would not write 'Nihonshoki', the title of one of the two primary classics of early Japanese mythohistory, for 'Nihonjinron' as you did in your last post. I should add that I think Hermeneus had a point, only it got lost in his attitude, which certainly lacks, in its hypersensitiveness to his sense of endangered status, any delicacy of feeling. My argument was with his attitude, which might be tolerable were he erudite, since his knowledge would balance out his character defects. I detect in his manipulation of contributions to this site a political strategy to tone down to what he construes as Japanese national advantage and dignity, by throwing up pseudo-distinctions, as though there were established academic distinctions, between 'stereotype' and 'theory' (ron). All stereotypes, as Lord Keynes would have reminded Hermeneus had he ever read him, are born of theories. Most cultural theories of the kind we witness in the nihonjinron degenerate into clichés. In some sense the cliché reflects back on the theory. But Hermeneus can't grasp this. If, in warning you, I upset you by creating a misleading impression, I apologize. But the game underway has been played many times in here, and the eventual outcome was forseeable. I hope I saved you your time and probable wasted efforts, at least Nishidani 20:29, 27 May 2006 (UTC)