Revision as of 01:10, 27 May 2013 editNikkimaria (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users232,536 edits →Infobox: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:11, 27 May 2013 edit undoNikkimaria (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users232,536 edits →Infobox: addNext edit → | ||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
== Infobox == | == Infobox == | ||
Several editors have reverted my attempts to format the infobox in accordance with recommendations for long lists. |
Several editors have reverted my attempts to format the infobox in accordance with recommendations for long lists. I attempted to compromise by substituting an alternative template for one that one editor objected to, although I disagree with her objections to the initial template. Another editor has also restored obvious errors to the article, including a claim that a recording was made in the "11960s", with no valid rationale for doing so. I invite that editor to present her reasoning for that rather strange action. ] (]) 01:11, 27 May 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:11, 27 May 2013
Ihr werdet weinen und heulen, BWV 103 is currently a Music good article nominee. Nominated by Gerda Arendt (talk) at 06:53, 22 April 2013 (UTC) An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria and will decide whether or not to list it as a good article. Comments are welcome from any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article. This review will be closed by the first reviewer. To add comments to this review, click discuss review and edit the page.
|
Classical music: Compositions | |||||||
|
A fact from Ihr werdet weinen und heulen, BWV 103 appeared on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the Did you know column on 22 April 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Infobox
Several editors have reverted my attempts to format the infobox in accordance with recommendations for long lists. I attempted to compromise by substituting an alternative template for one that one editor objected to, although I disagree with her objections to the initial template. Another editor has also restored obvious errors to the article, including a claim that a recording was made in the "11960s", with no valid rationale for doing so. I invite that editor to present her reasoning for that rather strange action. Nikkimaria (talk) 01:11, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Categories: