Misplaced Pages

User talk:ThomasK: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 08:54, 29 May 2006 view sourceThomasK (talk | contribs)3,221 edits UNBLOCK DEMAND← Previous edit Revision as of 08:56, 29 May 2006 view source ThomasK (talk | contribs)3,221 edits UNBLOCK DEMANDNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{unblock}} {{unblock}}
Is this the wikipedia as it presents itself? to block the honest and let the real vandalizer get away with it? eg. the now very known articles manipulated. Is this the cocksucking wikipedia as it presents itself? to block the honest and let the real vandalizer get away with it? eg. the now very known articles manipulated. This ip adress is shared by dozen of users who want contribute to this shit.

Revision as of 08:56, 29 May 2006

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

ThomasK (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please provide a reason as to why you should be unblocked.
Change {{unblock}} to {{unblock | reason=your reason here ~~~~}}

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=original unblock reason |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=original unblock reason |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=original unblock reason |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Is this the cocksucking wikipedia as it presents itself? to block the honest and let the real vandalizer get away with it? eg. the now very known articles manipulated. This ip adress is shared by dozen of users who want contribute to this shit.

Category: