| Revision as of 08:30, 6 June 2013 editGuy Macon (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers59,290 edits →I see what you are doing at raspberry, (and its okay): WP:RS← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:05, 7 June 2013 edit undoElvey (talk | contribs)9,497 edits →Warning: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
| == ] == | == ] == | ||
| I have just restored your last comment against the post-edit by Elvey, with explanation. ] (]) 01:26, 6 June 2013 (UTC) | I have just restored your last comment against the post-edit by Elvey, with explanation. ] (]) 01:26, 6 June 2013 (UTC) | ||
| == Warning == | |||
| You have no business telling me not to accuse you of wrongdoing even when it's it's clear you've violated policy. Why wouldn't you want to be informed when you have violated policy, anyway? I'm not perfect. Neither are you. We both made both valid and invalid accusations against each other. In our interactions, I owned up to my mistakes, but you have not owned up to any. | |||
| You just falsely accused me of | |||
| :"deleting my comment on my talk page" | |||
| The diff you provided shows I did no such thing; the diff shows no deletion ''at all''. | |||
| Calling me a "POV-pushing edit warrior" was a personal attack. Policy requires you "comment on content, not on the contributor." | |||
| I already apologized for | |||
| That's twice that you have accused me of wrongdoing. Do it again and you and I are going to have a real problem. I have overlooked your behavior so far, but my patience is getting thin. If you honestly think that I have done something wrong, feel free to report it at WP:ANI and to ask them to block me for it. Do not accuse me elsewhere or you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. | |||
Revision as of 09:05, 7 June 2013
Template:Archive box collapsible
Welcome to Guy Macon's Misplaced Pages talk page.
|
"Misplaced Pages's articles are no place for strong views. Or rather, we feel about strong views the way that a natural history museum feels about tigers. We admire them and want our visitors to see how fierce and clever they are, so we stuff them and mount them for close inspection. We put up all sorts of carefully worded signs to get people to appreciate them as much as we do. But however much we adore tigers, a live tiger loose in the museum is seen as an urgent problem." --WP:TIGER
 | Start a new discussion thread |
Only 993062314 articles left until our billionth article!
We are only 993062314 articles away from our 1,000,000,000th article... --Guy Macon (talk)
Flow
In case anyone isn't aware of this already, Misplaced Pages:Flow is software that is planned to replace our current way of editing talk pages. I would encourage you all to take a look and possibly comment on the project. Thanks! --Guy Macon (talk) 18:50, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
Main Page Redesign
Please comment on the following proposal: Misplaced Pages talk:2013 main page redesign proposal#Proposed Simple Main Page Thanks! --Guy Macon (talk) 07:00, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
I see what you are doing at raspberry, (and its okay)
Don't just saw of the branch the troll is sitting on, just cut down the whole tree!
He doesn't learn does he?!
the page is just yet a week or so unprotected and he is at it again, with his single agenda.
Although I wrote this paragraph you removed, (and I probably could find a better source than the blog, if I wanted to) its a good price to pay to keep this troll at bay!
Thanks Mahjongg (talk) 19:33, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
- I agree. If someone comes up with a reliable source that says that the Raspberry Pi has a USB current problem, then we can can put that information in the Raspberry Pi article. If they come up with a reliable source that says that this is a widespread problem, then we can can put that information in the USB article. What we cannot do is allow anything based upon a blog or discussion group. I can post an entry on the Raspberry Pi discussion group saying that it cures cancer -- or that every so often one explodes and levels a small city, put the same info in Misplaced Pages, and cite the discussion group as a "source". --Guy Macon (talk) 08:30, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Secure Digital
I have just restored your last comment against the post-edit by Elvey, with explanation. Spike-from-NH (talk) 01:26, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Warning
You have no business telling me not to accuse you of wrongdoing even when it's it's clear you've violated policy. Why wouldn't you want to be informed when you have violated policy, anyway? I'm not perfect. Neither are you. We both made both valid and invalid accusations against each other. In our interactions, I owned up to my mistakes, but you have not owned up to any.
You just falsely accused me of
The diff you provided shows I did no such thing; the diff shows no deletion at all.
Calling me a "POV-pushing edit warrior" was a personal attack. Policy requires you "comment on content, not on the contributor."
I already apologized for
That's twice that you have accused me of wrongdoing. Do it again and you and I are going to have a real problem. I have overlooked your behavior so far, but my patience is getting thin. If you honestly think that I have done something wrong, feel free to report it at WP:ANI and to ask them to block me for it. Do not accuse me elsewhere or you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages.