| Revision as of 21:48, 17 June 2013 editRandykitty (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators122,722 edits Undid revision 560341825 by Reisio (talk): very mature!← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:05, 17 June 2013 edit undoSolomon7968 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users12,932 editsm Talkback (User talk:DGG) (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
| It was the obvious answer to the impoverished medlars article, but I didn't do it because of the tricky past editing history loss in the lost article that results from an improper merge. Is the medlars past edit history someplace where it can be seen? If so, bravo-- you did the correct and obvious thing. ]]]] 23:44, 16 June 2013 (UTC) | It was the obvious answer to the impoverished medlars article, but I didn't do it because of the tricky past editing history loss in the lost article that results from an improper merge. Is the medlars past edit history someplace where it can be seen? If so, bravo-- you did the correct and obvious thing. ]]]] 23:44, 16 June 2013 (UTC) | ||
| *The ] article itself was just blanked and replaced by a redirect, so the history is still accessible . Glad you agree with the merge, I think it also made for a better ] article. I've added "mergedto" and "mergedfrom" templates to both, to make it easier to navigate to the history. --] (]) 06:09, 17 June 2013 (UTC) | *The ] article itself was just blanked and replaced by a redirect, so the history is still accessible . Glad you agree with the merge, I think it also made for a better ] article. I've added "mergedto" and "mergedfrom" templates to both, to make it easier to navigate to the history. --] (]) 06:09, 17 June 2013 (UTC) | ||
| ==Talkback== | |||
| {{talkback|DGG|ts=22:05, 17 June 2013 (UTC)}} | |||
| Factual Mistake ]''''']''''' 22:05, 17 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:05, 17 June 2013
Hi, and welcome to my User Talk page! For new discussions, please add your comments at the very bottom and use a section heading (e.g., by using the "+" tab at the top of this page). I will respond on this page unless specifically requested otherwise. I dislike talk-back templates and fragmented discussions. If I post on your page you may assume that I will watch it for a response. If you post here I will assume the same (and that you lost interest if you stop following the discussion). Please note that I will only respond to email if the subject is too confidential/personal to be discussed on this talk page.
 Archives |
|
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Proposed deletion of International Society of Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization
The article International Society of Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Apparently non-notable organization; unreferenced and no assertion of notability
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dravecky (talk) 06:58, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
I respectfully invite your comment
Thanks! '-) --Hodgdon's secret garden (talk) 17:41, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm Dewritech. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Stitch Movement, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Dewritech (talk) 10:05, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Disputing your reversion of my edit of Journal of American Studies
I invite you to view my reasoning for disputing your reversion of my edit at: Talk:Journal of American Studies--DadaNeem (talk) 09:37, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Nice job on WP:BOLD merge of medlars article into medline article
It was the obvious answer to the impoverished medlars article, but I didn't do it because of the tricky past editing history loss in the lost article that results from an improper merge. Is the medlars past edit history someplace where it can be seen? If so, bravo-- you did the correct and obvious thing. SBHarris 23:44, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
- The MEDLARS article itself was just blanked and replaced by a redirect, so the history is still accessible
Talkback
Message added 22:05, 17 June 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Factual Mistake Solomon7968 22:05, 17 June 2013 (UTC)