| Revision as of 12:10, 15 July 2013 editKiefer.Wolfowitz (talk | contribs)39,688 edits →Copyright infringement: difficult to find the diffs, e.g. to personal attack.← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:30, 15 July 2013 edit undoPenwhale (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users7,574 edits →Copyright infringementNext edit → | ||
| Line 80: | Line 80: | ||
| Thanks! <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]]</span></small> 12:01, 15 July 2013 (UTC) | Thanks! <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]]</span></small> 12:01, 15 July 2013 (UTC) | ||
| * Kiefer, there is a ] when it comes to opening a case and archiving motions (carried or failed). For your first point, all non-party statements get moved to the case talk page (the details are ]). For your second point, ] are the procedures we follow. | |||
| * If all cut-and-paste moves for archival purposes (and such) are violations of copyrights, archival bots should not even be running under that same umbrella. Your argument cannot be applicable to pages that gather many archives (any of the AN related noticeboards, for example) and by the same token cannot be applied here. - ] | <sup>] and ]</sup> 17:30, 15 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:30, 15 July 2013
| 6:33 am, 9 January 2025 (PDT) Tiptoety's userpage | talk | e-mail | contribs | subpages | edit count | awards | adoption program | ||||||||||
for your enjoyment?Knock Knock! Who’s there? Thermos! Thermos who? Thermos be a better knock-knock joke than this! Risen from the dead?Unless I am mistaken, it looks like an article you deleted on Newcastle Grammar, here, has been resurrected as Newcastle Grammar School. GeorgeLouis (talk) 06:19, 27 April 2013 (UTC) Amiram GoldblumThere are growing concerns that Amiram Goldblum is himself editing the article about him. He has two accounts: User:Rastiniak and User:רסטיניאק. Take a look at the this sockpuppet investigation. Also, read the following discussion. רסטיניאק has removed the POV tag from the article twice so far: 1 and 2. While I don't find this subject particularly interesting, I'm alarmed by the fact that Goldblum is fighting tooth and nail to get users who question the neutrality of his article to get blocked. I request you to help us determine whether the two accounts indeed belong to Goldblum. Nataev (talk) 11:33, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
Portland "Wiknic" 2013!
Hope you are able to attend! --Another Believer (Talk) 20:42, 12 June 2013 (UTC) WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Chace WatsonI just wanted to draw your attention to WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Chace Watson. It involves an apparent good hand/bad hand account across Commons and English Misplaced Pages, and you the only one that can run checkuser on both.—Kww(talk) 03:29, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
You've got mail! Message added 02:30, 1 July 2013 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. Suresh 5 (talk) 02:30, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
Copyright infringementYou failed to credit the source when you created the page Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Civility_enforcement, which violated my and others' copyrights. Worse, you make it difficult to find the diffs, e.g. to AGK's "net negative" personal attack. Please fix the page history. Thanks! Kiefer.Wolfowitz 12:01, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
|
||||||||||
Done - Sorry about the delay.