| Revision as of 15:06, 26 July 2013 editMiszaBot III (talk | contribs)597,462 editsm Robot: Archiving 1 thread (older than 10d) to User talk:GabeMc/Archive 2.← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:24, 26 July 2013 edit undoLessHeard vanU (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users33,615 edits →In case of doubt: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
| I'll take a look at this FAC and provide a review after you're done with the long list provided by the other reviewer...hoping that user's comments will call to attention anything I might notice. No sense duplicating a moot point, eh? The article looks good and will definitely get my support. If you have the time in between addressing your FAC's reviewers, I'd love to have your review for an FAC for my work on the article ], which can be found at ], and for a featured list candidate, ] which can be found at ]. Thanks. All the best, --] (]) 23:01, 21 July 2013 (UTC) | I'll take a look at this FAC and provide a review after you're done with the long list provided by the other reviewer...hoping that user's comments will call to attention anything I might notice. No sense duplicating a moot point, eh? The article looks good and will definitely get my support. If you have the time in between addressing your FAC's reviewers, I'd love to have your review for an FAC for my work on the article ], which can be found at ], and for a featured list candidate, ] which can be found at ]. Thanks. All the best, --] (]) 23:01, 21 July 2013 (UTC) | ||
| == In case of doubt == | |||
| I still consider you a pedantic buffoon. ] (]) 21:24, 26 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:24, 26 July 2013
If you are an unregistered user you may contact me at User talk:GabeMc/IP
| Skip to table of contents |
| This is GabeMc's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 10 days  |
FAC comment
Hi. An editor that I rubbed the wrong way in a previous dispute may be using my FAC here as a venue for continuing their incivility. They appear to be making claims that are unlikely and posed only for the sake of argument. If I'm wrong, the FAC could you an opinion from an experienced editor either way. If it's no bother, could you comment/vote yourself at my nomination? It's a relatively short article to review. If not, feel free to ignore this message. Dan56 (talk) 04:39, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
- Never mind, no need as they have seemed to quite down since my response. Dan56 (talk) 23:22, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
Ringo Starr FAC
I'll take a look at this FAC and provide a review after you're done with the long list provided by the other reviewer...hoping that user's comments will call to attention anything I might notice. No sense duplicating a moot point, eh? The article looks good and will definitely get my support. If you have the time in between addressing your FAC's reviewers, I'd love to have your review for an FAC for my work on the article Trees (poem), which can be found at Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/Trees (poem)/archive1, and for a featured list candidate, List of colonial governors of New Jersey which can be found at Misplaced Pages:Featured list candidates/List of colonial governors of New Jersey/archive1. Thanks. All the best, --ColonelHenry (talk) 23:01, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
In case of doubt
I still consider you a pedantic buffoon. LessHeard vanU (talk) 21:24, 26 July 2013 (UTC)