| Revision as of 14:29, 21 June 2013 edit84.52.101.196 (talk) ←Blanked the page← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:20, 27 July 2013 edit undoBishonen (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators80,326 edits Warning: stop inserting that tag at Spanish Civil War and other disruption.Next edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ==July 2013== | |||
| I see from the history of ] that you copied the <nowiki>{{systemic bias}}</nowiki> tag you had originally put on the article in December 2012 and tried to edit war it into the article in February, then in March, and then in June, complete with the bot's of the tag six months ago… I'm going to assume good faith that you copied the old tag without noticing the date, and weren't intentionally trying to make it look like the article had been tagged since 2012. But in any case it's certainly battleground behavior, especially since I notice you added the very same mis-dated tag again '''today'''. As you were told in December, and then repeatedly this year, tagging is supposed to be accompanied by talkpage discussion and an attempt to reach consensus. There wasn't consensus at any time for the point you were making; yet here you are again, inserting the same tag, claiming the issue hasn't been resolved, which it has, repeatedly — consensus is completely against you. If you do it again, or otherwise disrupt the article, I'll block you for slow edit warring, and it'll be a longer block this time. Please use the talkpage to try to get consensus for your edits. Edit warring won't do it. ] | ] 22:20, 27 July 2013 (UTC). | |||
Revision as of 22:20, 27 July 2013
July 2013
I see from the history of Spanish Civil War that you copied the {{systemic bias}} tag you had originally put on the article in December 2012 and tried to edit war it into the article in February, then in March, and then in June, complete with the bot's original dating of the tag six months ago… I'm going to assume good faith that you copied the old tag without noticing the date, and weren't intentionally trying to make it look like the article had been tagged since 2012. But in any case it's certainly battleground behavior, especially since I notice you added the very same mis-dated tag again today. As you were told in December, and then repeatedly this year, tagging is supposed to be accompanied by talkpage discussion and an attempt to reach consensus. There wasn't consensus at any time for the point you were making; yet here you are again, inserting the same tag, claiming the issue hasn't been resolved, which it has, repeatedly — consensus is completely against you. If you do it again, or otherwise disrupt the article, I'll block you for slow edit warring, and it'll be a longer block this time. Please use the talkpage to try to get consensus for your edits. Edit warring won't do it. Bishonen | talk 22:20, 27 July 2013 (UTC).