Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 03:11, 6 August 2013

This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Template:WikiProject Molecular and Cellular Biology Template:WikiProject Genetics Food and drink This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Food and Drink task list: edit history watch purge To edit this page, select here Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink: Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish Participate in project-related deletion discussions. Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this. Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here. Provide photographs and images for Category:Misplaced Pages requested images of food Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages. Agriculture This article is within the scope of WikiProject Agriculture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of agriculture on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AgricultureWikipedia:WikiProject AgricultureTemplate:WikiProject AgricultureAgriculture ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

The following Misplaced Pages contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. Jytdog (talk · contribs) / Taco Bell GMO recall This user has contributed to the article.

Copyvio?

Canoe, what copyvio are you mentioning in this dif? thx Jytdog (talk) 22:06, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

yoohoo, User:Canoe1967! Jytdog (talk) 23:33, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

You mean besides the fact that it is a copy/paste from the source? I think that is defined as copyvio by us. We should try to use 'wide' paraphrasing as much as we can and avoid Misplaced Pages:Close paraphrasing.--Canoe1967 (talk) 00:24, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

I didn't even look at the source until after I made this change, so I didn't copy/paste anything. The language you are using, about "unfit", is not used in any regulatory context. If the FDA had acted, they would have said that the taco shells were "adulterated" because they contained ingredients that were not GRAS or had not received approval. The broad term generally used is "approved" and using a common term is no copyvio. How can you say a single word is copyvio in any case? I am really curious. Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 00:46, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

btw here is the FDA's page for consumers on how new food ingredients are approved. http://www.fda.gov/Food/IngredientsPackagingLabeling/FoodAdditivesIngredients/ucm094211.htm, which is the first thing they would probably reach for. Here is the guidance document on food from GMOs: http://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/GuidanceDocumentsRegulatoryInformation/Biotechnology/ucm096095.htm Jytdog (talk) 00:48, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

• I feel your interaction with me by reverting the other article and statements on my talk page show you are COI with this article. I have added the appropriate tag to it. I may bring this up at the COI drama board to see if any other articles warrant it as well.--Canoe1967 (talk) 00:34, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

I don't understand what you mean about COI, strange. You mentioned this article in two discussions directly with me (one in the GM controversies article Talk page and again on your Talk page) so I cannot see how you can complain that I come look at it, and edit it. But as I said I am happy to discuss. Jytdog (talk) 00:46, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

You admitted above that you edited the article without even reading the source!!!!!!!!!!! This indicates to me that you are using your OR and POV to edit articles. I recommend you avoid pushing this with other GMO articles or I will seek consensus to add the same tag to other articles you have edited. You did similar earlier by wrongly labeling Kraft as the manufacturer, which you would have not done if you had read the source. I think you should take a break from GMO articles. You seem to Misplaced Pages:OWN existing ones and disrupt newer ones with the above POV, COI, OR, etc, etc, etc. If your above links refer to the subject of this article then feel free to add material from them. If not they don't belong here.--Canoe1967 (talk) 01:37, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

@Canoe1967: Let me make the observation that you seem to be in a highly defensive mode here. Maybe you need to chill out a little bit. -- Ohc _{¿que pasa?} 01:43, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi Canoe, simple copyediting doesn't require going to the sources at hand for something high level like this, and I am already familiar with the incident. Best regards. Jytdog (talk) 02:49, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Please explain what 'high level' means. Again, may I assume that "I am already familiar with the incident" shows that you are using your COI POV and not using sources. Misplaced Pages reflects what sources say, not those "familiar with the incident."--Canoe1967 (talk) 03:11, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

• All unassessed articles
• Unassessed Food and drink articles
• Unknown-importance Food and drink articles
• WikiProject Food and drink articles
• Unassessed Agriculture articles
• Unknown-importance Agriculture articles
• WikiProject Agriculture articles
• Articles edited by connected contributors