Misplaced Pages

:Sockpuppet investigations/Moheen Reeyad: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations Browse history interactivelyNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 09:09, 15 August 2013 editBlack Kite (talk | contribs)Administrators85,251 edits Created page with '{{subst:SPI report |checkuser=yes <!-- Please do not enter anything in the subject/headline box! If you want to request checkuser, simply change the line above ...'  Revision as of 16:55, 15 August 2013 edit undoPonyo (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators171,535 edits Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments: resultsNext edit →
Line 25: Line 25:


======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== ======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>======
The three accounts are a {{confirmed}} match to each other. The editing pattern is odd from a technical standpoint, and I cannot completely discount ], however the accounts cross-over multiple times on multiple IPs and are without a doubt connected to the point that they should be considered the same individual.--]<sup>]</sup> 16:55, 15 August 2013 (UTC)



----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> ----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. -->

Revision as of 16:55, 15 August 2013

Moheen Reeyad

Moheen Reeyad (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed

For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Moheen Reeyad/Archive.


15 August 2013

– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.

Suspected sockpuppets


See current WP:ANI thread here. One of the main problems why the thread was raised was because of the users accepting each other's AFC submissions and/or immediately editing pages created by the others, which is immediately suspicious. However, upon going through the three users' contribs it is quite noticeable that

  • They often edit at the same times with little overlap. Take this morning - all edited between 06:34 and 07:02. However, there has been the odd overlap, suggesting either multiple computers or meatpuppetry.
  • Stylistically they write similarly. They also make the same spelling and grammar mistakes - "lick" instead of "like", or "X is born on ..." rather than "X was born on ..." Black Kite (talk) 09:09, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

The three accounts are a  Confirmed match to each other. The editing pattern is odd from a technical standpoint, and I cannot completely discount a coordinated effort, however the accounts cross-over multiple times on multiple IPs and are without a doubt connected to the point that they should be considered the same individual.--Jezebel'sPonyo 16:55, 15 August 2013 (UTC)


Categories: