| Revision as of 23:24, 17 August 2013 editThe Bushranger (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators157,905 edits Closing debate, result was delete← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:21, 19 August 2013 edit undoFred newman (talk | contribs)78 editsm ←Blanked the pageNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
| :''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' | |||
| <!--Template:Afd top | |||
| Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | |||
| The result was '''delete'''. ]. ] <sub><font color="maroon">]</font></sub> 23:24, 17 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ===]=== | |||
| :{{la|Nicholas Alahverdian}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks"></span>) | |||
| :({{Find sources|Nicholas Alahverdian}}) | |||
| Fails ], ], and I didn't see any other criteria he'd fall under. Should either be deleted or redirected to ], but perhaps that article should be deleted as well. The edit history for the article is also a bit sketchy with a lot of ]s. ] (]) 00:04, 17 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ]] <small>(note: not a ]!)</small> 00:13, 17 August 2013 (UTC)</small> | |||
| :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ]] <small>(note: not a ]!)</small> 00:14, 17 August 2013 (UTC)</small> | |||
| :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ]] <small>(note: not a ]!)</small> 00:15, 17 August 2013 (UTC)</small> | |||
| *'''Delete''' or perhaps redirect to ], if that article meets the notability guidelines for court cases (I'm not sure what those are currently). I added the notability tag to the article and I'll repeat what I said on the talk page "Subject of article does not seem to meet ] currently. The article does not violate ] because everything is sourced, however the source articles do not verify notability. The only thing that comes close is the court case mentioned at the bottom, however, that still fails to meet the guidelines for a bio article (or even article pertaining to the event laid out within ]. Also, I have suspicions the article may have been made by the subject, which isn't expressly forbidden on Misplaced Pages, but doesn't help the argument that the bio was made simply due to the subject's notability." ] (]) 00:18, 17 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ** I am the above IP address user. This AFD has been blanked once by a new account, cutting off discussion. Is an admin seeing this activity? Thanks! ] (]) 01:10, 17 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ] (]) 01:00, 17 August 2013 (UTC)</small> | |||
| :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ] (]) 01:00, 17 August 2013 (UTC)</small> | |||
| *'''Delete''' per nom. <span style="border:1px solid #900;padding:2px;background:#fffff4">] ]</span> 01:47, 17 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Delete''' as BLP:1E. An spa has been deleting many of this AfD's entries on siscussion pages. Admin attention needed. ] (]) 02:07, 17 August 2013 (UTC). | |||
| * '''Delete''' - Originator of a legal case, defendant in a legal case, and blogger. Coverage of the first two is superficial; of the latter seemingly non-existent. Pretty clearly either self-written or pay-for-play. It's a nicely constructed Misplaced Pages article, but on the strict question of whether this subject passes GNG — or any Special Notability low bar — that answer appears to be no. ] (]) 02:27, 17 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Comment''' - related AfD is at ]. <span style="border:1px solid #900;padding:2px;background:#fffff4">] ]</span> 02:45, 17 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Delete''' - ] with a good solid helping of ] thrown into the mix. There's a whole section where someone has tried to reinterpret ] court documents to re-argue a legal case, much of which is a blatant ] violation. Can someone ] close this and be done with it? ]] 03:09, 17 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Delete''', ] ''at best'', and even that might be somewhat generous. ] - <b><FONT COLOR="#FF0000">St</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FF5500">ar</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FF8000">bli</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FFC000">nd</FONT></b> 04:14, 17 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Comment''' - I deleted a large portion of the page as a ] violation and outlined my reasons on the talk page (somewhat limited - it's worse than what I explained, I have further information that I am willing to provide to any admin that needs it). <span style="border:1px solid #900;padding:2px;background:#fffff4">] ]</span> 05:53, 17 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Delete''' - Yea, google for this guy's name and it turns up a slew of blogs and such where his crusade (against a wide variety of things) is carried out, in excruciating detail. There's nothing of ''actual'' notability though, and what reliable sources do make mention of this person do so in the context of the lawsuit and even then only briefly. The lawsuit itself isn't notable either. ] (]) 12:43, 17 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Delete''' Like others have said, on a good day this might meet ] at best. This isn't a good day. ] (]) 21:24, 17 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Delete''' As per the clear consensus already established. No notability established.] (]) 21:50, 17 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | |||