Misplaced Pages

User talk:GiantSnowman: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:44, 20 August 2013 editHugo999 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers801,062 editsm BLP← Previous edit Revision as of 08:44, 21 August 2013 edit undoDweller (talk | contribs)Bureaucrats, Oversighters, Administrators55,877 edits Barnstar: new WikiLove messageNext edit →
Line 45: Line 45:
== Canvassing?== == Canvassing?==
Re my so-called canvassing, may I point out that I was merely notifying other contributors of so-called “small” categories that the proposer wished to delete the categories that they had created.] (]) 21:44, 20 August 2013 (UTC) Re my so-called canvassing, may I point out that I was merely notifying other contributors of so-called “small” categories that the proposer wished to delete the categories that they had created.] (]) 21:44, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

== Barnstar ==

{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ]
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''Dweller's Barnstar of Good Faith'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Inaugural award, made to GiantSnowman for twice engaging in the same tricky dispute without becoming heated and for piles of excellent, good-faith edits. ] (]) 08:44, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
|}

Revision as of 08:44, 21 August 2013

Archiving icon
Archives

2006
2007
2008
20 09
2010
2011
2012
2013


Mediation

Hi there GS, AL "here", how's it going?

please wage in regarding this message i sent to this user (see here http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Italia2006#Inter_Milan_-_Reply), in his page, i'll check it later today. Whatever your position is - i imagine yours will reflect a consensus of the WP football community - i'll duly abide by.

Happy week, keep it up --AL (talk) 04:11, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

He responded to me yes sir, but i'd like for him to hear your opinion if possible. He says that there is a consensus and team should be called INTERNAZIONALE. Hard to "swallow" as much as i know he's acting in good faith, why was the article moved to INTER MILAN then?

If you can't/won't add your two cents nevermind (i know you're having a hard day as illustrated by the message right below mine), cheers and sorry for any inconvenience. --AL (talk) 15:15, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Pathetic

Following my articles and supporting idiotic deletion requests because you can't handle the fact you were admonished for bullying and abusing admin powers and breaching 3RR? Hilarious. No wonder Misplaced Pages is going down the drain, with guys like you being given admin titles. Macktheknifeau (talk) 09:53, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

TSV 1865 Dachau

Hey,

You told me to let you know when the article is finished, and I have finished the article on 8/17, putting in the last section when you went on holiday, I hope you have the time to look at it and let me know what you think? Cheers for helping me with the little details on TSV 1865 Dachau! :) Hisakiwa21 (talk) 14:36, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

BLP

Hi. I don't know if you remember, but a few months ago, we had a small disagreement over the interpretation of an aspect of BLP. It's still on my talk page. Your viewpoint really surprised me, but I didn't have the headspace to get to the bottom of it at the time.

I've always intended to come back to it at some point, because if two goodfaith editors active around BLPs can understand a policy so differently, something is wrong with it. I think it's really important to get it sorted, whichever interpretation is ultimately decided upon.

So, I've finally got around to doing something about it. I've just posted at WT:BLP asking for some clarification. I've deliberately left names out of it - you're an excellent editor that I have tremendous respect for and I saw no need to make the discussion heated.

I wanted:

  1. ) to let you know, as a courtesy, that I've started that discussion
  2. ) to encourage you to join in, if you have time, because your viewpoint is essential and
  3. ) to tell you that I'll abide by consensus, as I always do

Hope you're well and enjoying the new season. I think it's going to be a cracker.

Cheers, --Dweller (talk) 15:46, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Canvassing?

Re my so-called canvassing, may I point out that I was merely notifying other contributors of so-called “small” categories that the proposer wished to delete the categories that they had created.Hugo999 (talk) 21:44, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Barnstar

Dweller's Barnstar of Good Faith
Inaugural award, made to GiantSnowman for twice engaging in the same tricky dispute without becoming heated and for piles of excellent, good-faith edits. Dweller (talk) 08:44, 21 August 2013 (UTC)