Fall of Jericho: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 21:52, 19 August 2013 editDMacks (talk \| contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators186,433 edits -spam Undid revision 558654586 by 71.182.134.106 (talk)← Previous edit		Revision as of 18:47, 29 August 2013 edit undo68.153.116.160 (talk) →Biblical account Tag: section blankingNext edit →
Line 17:		Line 17:
	}}		}}
	The '''Battle of Jericho''' is a battle in the ] ], ({{bibleverse\|\|Joshua\|6:1-27\|HE}}) the first battle of the ] during their ]. According to the narrative, the walls of ] fell after ]'s Israelite army marched around the city blowing their ].		The '''Battle of Jericho''' is a battle in the ] ], ({{bibleverse\|\|Joshua\|6:1-27\|HE}}) the first battle of the ] during their ]. According to the narrative, the walls of ] fell after ]'s Israelite army marched around the city blowing their ].

	== Biblical account ==
	=== Spying on Jericho===
	Before crossing into the land west of the ], Joshua sent two spies to look over the land. The king of Jericho heard that two Israelite spies were within his city and ordered them to be brought out to him. The spies were charged with ascertaining where the guards were placed, whether anyone disliked the king and could help them, what weaponry and armour the guards had, when the guards changed shifts, how much food, water, and other supplies the city had, and the height and width of the walls so as to determine how to overcome the city.

	The woman with whom the spies were staying was named ] and she protected them by hiding the two men on her roof. She tells them how the citizens of Jericho had been fearful of the Israelites ever since they defeated the Egyptians via the ] (some 40 years prior), and agrees to cover for them on condition that she and her family are spared in the upcoming battle. The spies agree provided three conditions are met:
	# She must distinguish her house from the others so the soldiers will know which one to spare
	# Her family must be inside the house during the battle, and
	# She must not later turn in the spies.
	Rahab agrees to the conditions: she hangs a scarlet rope outside her window to distinguish her house from the others.

	Safely escaping the city, the two returned to Joshua and reported that the "whole land was melting with fear."
	]: The Taking of Jericho, c. 1452-1460. Note the anachronistic medieval European architecture.]]

	=== The battle ===
	The biblical account describes the Israelites being led by ] and crossing the Jordan into Canaan where they laid siege to the city of Jericho. There, God spoke to Joshua telling him to march around the city once every day for six days with the seven priests carrying ram's horns in front of the ark. On the seventh day they were to march around the city seven times and the priests were to blow their ]. And Joshua ordered the people to shout. The walls of the city collapsed, and the Israelites were able to charge straight into the city. The city was ], and every man, woman, child and animal in it was killed by Joshua's army as an offering to God. Only Rahab and her family were spared, because she had hidden the two spies sent by Joshua. After this, Joshua burned the remains of the city and cursed any man who would rebuild the city of Jericho would do so at the cost of his firstborn son. It is generally accepted that the biblical date for the fall of the walls is the 28th of ], according to the ].<ref></ref>

	==Historicity==		==Historicity==

Revision as of 18:47, 29 August 2013

Battle of Jericho

James Tissot, The Taking of Jericho

Location	Jericho
Result	Decisive Hebrew Victory

Belligerents

Israelites

Canaanites

Commanders and leaders

Joshua

King of Jericho †

Strength

40,000

Unknown

Casualties and losses

Nil

Unknown

The Battle of Jericho is a battle in the biblical Book of Joshua, (Joshua 6:1–27) the first battle of the Israelites during their conquest of Canaan. According to the narrative, the walls of Jericho fell after Joshua's Israelite army marched around the city blowing their trumpets.

Historicity

The first scientific investigation of the site of Jericho was carried out by Charles Warren in 1868, but amounted to no more than a site-survey (Warren's prime interest was in establishing the modern equivalents of Biblical locales). In 1907-09 and again in 1911 digging was carried out by two German archaeologists, Carl Watzinger and Ernest Sellin. Watzinger and Sellin believed that they would be able to validate the Biblical story of Jericho's destruction by Joshua and the Israelites, but concluded instead that the city was unoccupied at the generally-accepted time of Joshua, ca. 1400 B.C.

These results were tested in 1930-36 by John Garstang, at the suggestion of William F. Albright, the doyen of Palestinian archaeology at the time. Garstang discovered the remains of a network of collapsed walls which he dated to about 1400 BCE, the time he believed the Israelites were on their conquest, that had apparently fallen in a dramatic fashion as opposed to being ruined by abandonment or decay from natural forces. Garstang's work thus reversed the conclusions of the earlier diggings.

By the post-war period a revolution had occurred in archaeological methodology, and Albright accordingly asked Kathleen Kenyon, one of the most respected practitioners of the new archaeology, to excavate at Jericho once more. Kenyon dug over 1952-1958 and traced the entire history of the city from the earliest Neolithic settlement. She did this by digging a narrow deep trench maintaining clean, squared off edges, rigorously examining the soil and recording its stratification, and thus building up a cross-section of the tell. When presented with an area that would require wider areas to be excavated - the floor plan of a house for example - she carefully dug in measured squares while leaving an untouched strip between each section to allow the stratification to remain visible. Kenyon reported that her work showed Garstang to have been wrong and the Germans right - Jericho had been deserted at the accepted Biblical date of the Conquest.

In 1990, biblical archaeologist (with a particular focus on Canaanite pottery), and Research Director of the inerrantist Associates for Biblical Research Bryant G. Wood proposed that the pottery recovered during the excavations of Garstang and Kenyon pointed to a destruction date of the city ca. 1400 B.C. rather than 1550 B.C., as concluded by Kenyon. Wood's main argument was that Kenyon's conclusion was based on the expensive, imported Cypriot pottery that was not found at the excavation site and that she ignored the vast amount of local pottery that was recovered. In addition to the ceramic data, Wood appealed to stratigraphy, a scarab series uncovered by Garstang, and a carbon-14 sample of a single charcoal piece found in the destruction debris as further evidence in favor of the later 1400 BCE destruction date. Wood's proposal did not settle the debate and he was forced to defend his argument against direct criticism, specifically from Piotr Bienkowski.

In 1995, Kenyon's result was corroborated by radiocarbon tests which dated test samples taken from the site to 1562 BCE (plus/minus 38 years) with a certainty of 95%. The specific charcoal sample Wood referenced in his proposition was found to be in error and corrected to 1590 or 1527 +/- 110 BCE

References

Categories:

Misplaced Pages