Misplaced Pages

User talk:Roger Davies: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:17, 31 August 2013 editMiszaBot III (talk | contribs)597,462 editsm Robot: Archiving 1 thread (older than 4d) to User talk:Roger Davies/Archive 28.← Previous edit Revision as of 11:13, 1 September 2013 edit undoGerda Arendt (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers381,928 edits Fair enough: new sectionNext edit →
Line 45: Line 45:
</div> </div>
<!-- EdwardsBot 0609 --> <!-- EdwardsBot 0609 -->

== Fair enough ==

You voted "Fair enough" for a proposal to restrict me. The proposal is very general and would include to restrict me from adding infoboxes to my own articles and to articles in uncontroversial areas, the majority that is, - classical music and architecture are rather exceptions. Perhaps you and I have a different understanding of "fair". I ] and ask you to please comment what I should avoid in the future. You don't have to look at the "reverts" for me. I would always try to improve something in place in the article, for the readers to see it, instead of a complete revert. --] (]) 11:13, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:13, 1 September 2013

This user is lead coordinator of the Military history WikiProjectThis user is a coordinator emeritus of the Military history WikiProject
This user is lead coordinator of the Military history WikiProject
This user is an administratorThis user is an administrator
This user is an administrator
This user is a member of the Arbitration CommitteeThis user is a member of the Arbitration Committee
This user is a member of the Arbitration Committee

ARCHIVES: 12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031


If you are here about an arbitration matter, please post instead on the appropriate arbitration page to keep discussion centralised.


If you post a message on this page, I'll reply here to avoid fragmenting the discussion. So add it to your watchlist.
If I leave you a message on your talk page, it will be added to my watchlist. So feel free to reply to it there instead of here.
Please sign and date your message by typing four tildes (~~~~)


The Signpost: 28 August 2013

Fair enough

You voted "Fair enough" for a proposal to restrict me. The proposal is very general and would include to restrict me from adding infoboxes to my own articles and to articles in uncontroversial areas, the majority that is, - classical music and architecture are rather exceptions. Perhaps you and I have a different understanding of "fair". I listed a few cases and ask you to please comment what I should avoid in the future. You don't have to look at the "reverts" for me. I would always try to improve something in place in the article, for the readers to see it, instead of a complete revert. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:13, 1 September 2013 (UTC)